Transgenic Blimp-1 Promoter Directs Hematopoietic Specific Gene Expression in Mice.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract B lymphocyte induced maturation protein-1 (Blimp-1) is a transcriptional repressor involved in B-lymphocyte differentiation and reported to be relatively plasma cell specific. The mechanisms that control its gene expression remain unknown although internal regulatory sequences have been postulated as required for B cell specificity. Aimed at directing therapeutic proteins into myeloma cells, we employed a transgenic strategy in studying the Blimp-1 promoter. We first cloned 5kb, 2.5kb and 1.6kb Blimp-1 promoter fragments from a BAC clone that contains the entire mouse Blimp-1 gene and fused the promoters to the luciferase reporter gene. As compared to a basal promoter PGL3, the Blimp-1 promoter fragments all demonstrated high and similar transcriptional activity (>7 fold over baseline) when transfected into BHK, Raji, OCIMy5 cells and R1 ES cells but weak activity (<2 fold) in murine preB leukemia cells. To further dissect Blimp-1 promoter function in vivo, the 5 kb promoter fragment (−4700 to +72bp) was fused to EGFP and used to generate transgenic mice. Northern blot and RT-PCR demonstrated that EGFP was expressed in the spleen, bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) lymphocytes but not in the other tissue types examined. By FACS analysis, however, the EGFP positive population proved to be low (0.5–1%) in the spleen, PB or BM. To achieve higher Blimp-1 promoter-driven EGFP expression, we electroporated the 5kb Blimp-1/EGFP construct into ES cells and screened for higher EGFP expression clones. One clone with strong EGFP expression was used in blastocyst injection and generating chimeric mice. In this way, we have generated transgenic lines with higher EGFP expression in the spleen, BM and PB (3.2–4.7%, 2.2-3.4% and 3.8- 7.5%, respectively). After stimulation of cultured spleen and BM cells with 20 ug/ml LPS for 72 hrs, the EGFP population increased 2–3 fold in spleen cells and 3–4 fold in BM cells. Further FACS analyses of EGFP expression in LPS stimulated spleen cells demonstrated that EGFP was expressed in 14% of plasma cells (CD138+), 6.7% of mature B cells (CD19+), 4.6% of pre-B and B-cells (B220+) and 9.3% of CD8+ T cells. In BM culture after LPS plus IL-3 and IL-7 stimulation for 72 hr., EGFP is expressed in 8.7% of CD138+ cells, 5.9% of CD19+ cells, 6.9% of B220+ cells, 10% of TER119+ cells (erythropoietic cells), 11.3% of Sca-1+ cells and 12.8% cKit+ cells (progenitor cells). Furthermore, intravenous delivery of LPS resulted in upregulated EGFP expression in B cells, T cells and macrophages. The number of circulating B220-positive and EGFP-positive B cells doubled within 48hrs after LPS i.v. injection. Given EGFP expression in ES cells as well as Sca-1 and c-Kit+ve cells we examined emryos by fluorescent microscopy and observed strong EGFP expression in 9.5 dpc to 19.5 dpc mouse embryos. The precise localization of expression is now being analyzed. In summary: (1). The 5kb, 2.5kb and 1.6 kb Blimp-1 promoter fragments have similar transcriptional activity; (2). The 5kb Blimp-1 promoter is functional in vivo and specifically directs gene expression in all hematopoietic lineages. (3). The 5kb promoter is sufficient for LPS regulation. (4). The 5kb promoter is active in mouse embryonic development. As B cells were not specifically targeted we conclude that Blimp-1 has wider expression potential than previously recognized or that elements which control B cell specificity lie outside of the promoter fragments studied.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».