MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2981061287 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-116981

Inactivation of Stage-Specific B-Cell Commitment Genes Generates Distinct Molecular Subtypes of BCR-ABL1 Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2018· article· en· W2981061287 sur OpenAlexaff
Jaeseung Kim, Michelle Chan‐Seng‐Yue, Gavin W. Wilson, Andrea Arruda, Karen Ng, Olga I. Gan, Stephanie M. Dobson, Paul M. Krzyzanowski, Johann Hitzler, Anne Tierens, John E. Dick, Mark D. Minden, John D. McPherson, Faiyaz Notta

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyImatinib mesylateCancer researchMyeloid leukemiaDasatinibLeukemiaImmunologyImatinib

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), the most common form of ALL in adults, is a highly aggressive blood malignancy defined by the BCR-ABL1 fusion. Although inhibitors targeting the BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein, such as imatinib, have significantly improved clinical response rates for this disease, a subset of patients are refractory to therapy or respond initially but relapse soon after. ABL1 kinase domain mutations partly explain differential responses in patients; however, for the majority of cases, a molecular basis that can reconcile this clinical observation is lacking. Methods Flow-sorted blasts from 53 primary samples, 49 de novo Ph+ ALL and 4 lymphoid blast crisis CML, were subjected to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and whole genome sequencing (WGS). Response rates were tracked using BCR-ABL1 transcript levels from patient blood. Results Hierarchical clustering of transcriptome data produced two molecular subgroups of Ph+ ALL. One subgroup, which we termed 'Core-B', upregulated key regulators of B-lymphoid differentiation including IL7R and MS4A1 (CD20). By contrast, the second subgroup upregulated an expression program related to hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) and myeloid differentiation, with upregulation of KIT, CD34, MPO, CSF3R, and GATA3. We termed this subgroup 'Aberrant-Stem-Myeloid' (ASM). These subgroups displayed a striking disparity in response rates to intensive chemotherapy with imatinib. Whereas 'Core-B' patients showed highly durable responses often lasting many years, 'ASM' patients frequently relapsed (4% vs 43% relapse; p=0.007). We used WGS analysis to investigate the genetic basis of these molecular subtypes. 'Core-B' Ph+ ALLs were enriched for deletions in PAX5, a B-cell specification gene, and CDKN2A/B, tumor suppressors. The 'ASM' subtype lacked these genetic alterations; instead, these leukemias were enriched for deletions in EBF1, an early B-cell lineage factor that represses T-lymphoid and myeloid lineages and is expressed before PAX5 in B-cell lineage differentiation. Accordingly, blasts from 'ASM' leukemias with EBF1 deletions showed decreased CD19 antigen expression and upregulation of myeloid antigens by clinical flow cytometry. Rare cases with concurrent EBF1 and PAX5 deletions showed expression features of both 'ASM' and 'Core-B' leukemias. Mutations observed in myeloid leukemias (TET2, RUNX1) were only present in the 'ASM' subtype. Loss of IKZF1, found in 77% of cases, also displayed distinct patterns between the two subgroups; deletions leading to the dominant negative isoform (Ik6) were enriched in the 'Core-B' subgroup (45% vs. 14%; p=0.019) while monosomy 7 and large deletions encompassing IKZF1 were enriched in the 'ASM' leukemias (41% vs. 10%; p=0.017). In 1 of 4 diagnosis/relapse patients analyzed, a molecular switch from 'Core-B' at diagnosis to 'ASM' at relapse was observed. The diagnostic 'Core-B' clone from this patient harbored a PAX5 mutation that was lost at relapse, whereas the relapsed 'ASM' clone harbored trisomy 21 and a RUNX1 mutation. Altogether, our data suggest that the 'ASM' leukemias emerge through dysregulation of genes earlier in lympho-myeloid specification compared to 'Core-B' leukemias. These findings led us to investigate if the 'ASM' subtype originates from an HSC and the 'Core-B' subtype originates from a B-cell progenitor. We first looked at the distribution of the long (p210) and short (p190) isoforms of BCR-ABL1 in the two subtypes. The p210 isoform, also the hallmark of CML, is speculated to arise in an HSC, and the p190 is thought to arise in a B-cell progenitor. Neither the p190 or p210 BCR-ABL1 isoform was enriched in either subgroup. We resolved highly purified HSC and progenitor subsets from CD34+CD19- cells, functionally evaluated by methylcellulose assays, and subjected them to a sensitive nested-PCR strategy. Cases from both the 'ASM' and 'Core-B' subtypes showed HSC/myeloid progenitor involvement regardless of the BCR-ABL1 isoform. This data suggest that the cell-of-origin does not play a role in establishing the molecular subtype of leukemia blasts. Conclusion There are two distinct molecular subtypes of Ph+ ALL that demonstrate differential responses to treatment and emerge from independent mutational routes. Moreover, the key genetic determinants that form the molecular subtype are secondary driver alterations that lie downstream of BCR-ABL1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207