MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2981127371 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-113493

Bay 94-9027 Can be Accurately Measured across Regions with Appropriate One-Stage Assay Reagent Use

2018· article· en· W2981127371 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rajiv K. Pruthi, Donna D. Castellone, Nikki Church, Lilley Leong, Steve Kitchen

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBayChromogenicReagentStage (stratigraphy)ImmunologyChromatographyChemistryMedicineBiologyGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Differences in coagulation assay reagents may lead to variable results for some extended-half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products, with the potential to adversely affect patient care. Laboratories assessing EHL-rFVIII activity can choose from many available one-stage assay and chromogenic assay reagents. A field study was conducted to evaluate the ability of clinical laboratories to accurately measure FVIII activity in plasma samples spiked with BAY 94-9027, an EHL rFVIII, when using diverse assay reagents and when guided in the choice of reagent. In a regional subanalysis, BAY 94-9027 field study results from clinical laboratories in the United States and Canada were compared with those from Europe and Israel. Methods: In this 2-part study, a broad range of laboratories in the United States, Canada, Europe (Austria, Germany, Italy, Romania, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom), and Israel were provided samples containing defined concentrations of BAY 94-9027 or an unmodified rFVIII (antihemophilic factor [recombinant] plasma/albumin-free method [rAHF-PFM]) as a control. In part 1, each laboratory measured FVIII activity using their routine methods (one-stage assay, chromogenic assay, or both); laboratories that had ≥2 routine one-stage assays were asked to perform sample testing with one of the less commonly used assays in the laboratory to ensure that part 1 captured both the prevalence and heterogeneity of one-stage assays used in the geographic regions studied. In part 2, laboratories used one-stage assays with SynthASil and Pathromtin SL reagents provided by Bayer; SynthASil and Pathromtin SL have previously been shown to accurately measure BAY 94-9027 and full-length rFVIII products. The field study data were analyzed to identify the most commonly used reagents in the 2 regions (United States/Canada and Europe/Israel) and to assess if regional differences resulted in differences in accuracy of FVIII activity measurement. Results: 52 laboratories (US/Canada, n=25; Europe/Israel, n=27) participated in the field study. The one-stage reagent SynthASil was commonly used in all countries (n=15) in part 1, but differences were seen in the frequency of use of other reagents. PTT-A (n=6) and Actin FSL (n=5) were frequently used in the US/Canada and Actin FS (n=6) and Pathromtin SL (n=6) in Europe/Israel. Regional differences in the choice of assay, with US/Canada more likely to use assays that did not accurately measure BAY 94-9027, affected the ability of laboratories to accurately measure FVIII activity in the spiked samples (Figure). In part 1 of the study, regional differences in median recovery of BAY 94-9027 were seen among laboratories when using their own in-house one-stage assays. These differences were not seen in part 2 of the study when laboratories used provided reagents (SynthASil and Pathromtin SL), despite using the same instrumentation as used in part 1. Regional differences in part 1 might have been exacerbated by use of less common, and potentially inappropriate, one-stage assay reagents, affecting the accuracy of BAY 94-9027 measurement. Chromogenic assay use was more common in Europe/Israel (n=11) than US/Canada (n=5). No regional differences in chromogenic assay results were observed. Conclusions: Most clinical laboratories were able to accurately measure BAY 94-9027 activity using their in-house assays. However, regional differences in the accurate measurement of BAY 94-9027 activity were influenced by regional choice of one-stage reagents used in part 1 of the study; the activity and accuracy differences were eliminated when all laboratories used the same provided one-stage reagents with their in-house instruments (part 2 of study). Therefore, standardization of laboratory procedures and use of newer, more accurate one-stage assay reagents should improve measurement of FVIII activity with EHL products. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Castellone: Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Wilmer-Hale: Consultancy. Church:Bayer: Employment. Leong:Bayer: Employment. Kitchen:Bayer: Consultancy, Other: travel reimbursement, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,029

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,163
Tête enseignante GPT0,358
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→