MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2981273336 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000000813

Respiratory Complications Associated With Acetazolamide Use in the Management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

2019· article· en· W2981273336 sur OpenAlexaff
Fiona Costello, Kate Skolnik, Justyna R. Sarna, Rhea Varughese

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAcetazolamideMedicineAnesthesiaMetabolic acidosisPseudotumor cerebriInternal medicineIntracranial pressureGastroenterology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by manifestations of raised intracranial pressure and predominantly affects overweight young women (1). Although common symptoms of IIH include headaches, visual loss, and pulsatile tinnitus, the clinical presentation is highly variable (1). There is an emerging consensus that acetazolamide ameliorates the effects of IIH (1,2). By stopping the conversion of water and carbon dioxide to bicarbonate and hydrogen ions with carbonic anhydrase inhibition, acetazolamide reduces cerebrospinal fluid secretion with the consequent reduction of water and ions across the choroid plexus (1). In the 2014 IIH Treatment Trial, patients were treated with acetazolamide up to 4 g daily, with an average adherence of 89% in the treatment group (2,3). Seventeen treated IIH patients (20%) experienced 23 metabolic adverse effects, including metabolic acidosis (n = 6), decreased appetite (n = 6), hyperchloremia (n = 4), hypokalemia (n = 4), and dehydration (n = 2) (2,3). Although the metabolic acidosis associated with acetazolamide is typically mild, we present 2 IIH cases in which acetazolamide was associated with severe metabolic acidosis and respiratory compromise. CASE 1 A 52 -year old woman presented with a longstanding history of IIH (diagnosed by modified Dandy criteria), asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome, and obesity (body mass index [BMI] = 37 kg/m2). Her baseline spirometry showed mixed obstruction from airway disease and restriction from obesity (forced expiratory volume 1 1.48 L [53%], forced vital capacity 2.30 L [65%], ratio 64%). Three years before, she successfully used acetazolamide 2,500 mg daily during an IIH exacerbation with severe visual compromise. She had tapered her daily acetazolamide dose to 500–750 mg when she developed dyspnea, cough, fever, and somnolence. Arterial blood gas (ABG) revealed hypercapnia and acute respiratory acidosis with metabolic acidosis (pH 7.02, pCO2 121 mm Hg, pO2 75 mm Hg on 6 L of oxygen, HCO3 31 mmol/L), requiring 2 days of mechanical ventilation. While in the intensive care unit, she demonstrated numerous obstructive hypopneas with sustained oxygen desaturations, suggesting hypoventilation. She was diagnosed with multifactorial hypercapnic respiratory failure caused by COPD exacerbation and community-acquired pneumonia, worsened by untreated sleep-disordered breathing and smoking. Because of her presentation and profound academia, acetazolamide was discontinued. Her symptoms of headache and optic disc edema were well controlled after initiating continuous positive airway pressure therapy (titrated by polysomnogram) for chronic nocturnal hypoventilation. CASE 2 A 32-year old obese woman (BMI = 38 kg/m2) with a 14-year history of IIH (meeting modified Dandy criteria) and no known lung disease presented with severe headaches, vision loss, and papilledema. Her headaches were initially treated with twice daily acetazolamide 500 mg and topiramate 25 mg, without clinical improvement. After increasing acetazolamide to 1,500 mg per day, she developed painless dyspnea and tachypnea (without hypoxia). Primary pulmonary causes of dyspnea were excluded by chest x-ray, a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram, and ultrasound of the lower limbs. There was no wheeze, suggestive of asthma. ABG demonstrated normoxemia with an acute, partially compensated metabolic acidosis (low pH 7.35; low pCO2 24 mm Hg, high pO2 98 mm Hg, low HCO3 13 mmol/L, and high chloride 120 mmol/L). Contributions from renal disease, diabetes, and medication withdrawal were excluded. The hyperventilation was not due to anxiety, as this would be associated with respiratory alkalosis and hypophosphatemia. Her dyspnea resolved with cessation of acetazolamide and topiramate. The patient underwent lumbar drain insertion and ventriculoperitoneal shunt treatment to manage her condition, with complete clinical recovery. Her diagnosis was hyperventilation in response to metabolic acidosis, caused by combined topiramate and acetazolamide. Interestingly, in previous years, this patient had tolerated acetazolamide monotherapy of 2000 mg daily in divided doses. Six years before, she had used acetazolamide 500 mg 3 times daily with topiramate 75 mg twice daily without complications. Metabolic acidosis is the excessive accumulation of nonvolatile acid, leading to a reduction in serum bicarbonate concentration and low plasma pH (4). Clinical manifestations of metabolic acidosis in IIH are highly variable (5,6) and may include hyperventilation, fatigue, anorexia, cardiac arrhythmias, and coma (4,6). Both acetazolamide and topiramate cause metabolic acidosis, by inhibiting carbonic anhydrase enzymes required for effective bicarbonate reabsorption in the kidneys (4). Acetazolamide causes bicarbonaturia and mild hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, whereas topiramate generates a hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis (4). In Case 1, the patient had significant comorbidities. Thus, the extent acetazolamide contributed to her clinical decline is unclear. She was using a relatively low dose of acetazolamide when she developed respiratory failure, despite tolerating much higher doses previously. Regrettably, the complexity of her airway disease and obstructive sleep apnea with mild hypoventilation was unknown to her treating physicians because of her earlier noncompliance with pulmonary follow-up. Carbonic anhydrase inhibition may lead to impaired ventilation perfusion matching and reduction in hypoxic drive, worsening hypercapnia in the acutely unwell patient. This case illustrates the importance of communication between multidisciplinary team members regarding the potential deleterious effects of drugs that have the potential to exacerbate coexisting medical conditions. In Case 2, the topiramate and acetazolamide combination caused the patient's risk of metabolic acidosis, prompting a compensatory increase in the respiratory rate to reduce arterial carbon dioxide to normalize the pH. Excluding other causes of dyspnea, including primary pulmonary pathology, hyperventilation secondary to other causes of metabolic acidosis, and anxiety-induced hyperventilation (characterized by respiratory alkalosis and hypophosphatemia), was essential. This patient demonstrated good tolerability for these agents in combination previously. Her respiratory manifestations of metabolic acidosis seemed to be dose-dependent with the amount of daily acetazolamide she received. The lessons learned from this case include avoiding dual therapy with agents having carbonic anhydrase inhibitor activity when possible. Moreover, recognizing clinical manifestations of metabolic acidosis is critical because it has been linked to cerebral edema and coning in the setting of IIH in extreme circumstances (6). In summary, acetazolamide may result in adverse respiratory symptoms among individuals with or without lung disease, particularly when used at high doses and/or combined with topiramate. Individuals using acetazolamide for IIH should be monitored for electrolyte imbalances and tachypnea because these uncommon but potentially severe side effects may have insidious onset. STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP Category 1: a. Conception and design: F. Costello, K. Skolnik, J. Sarna, and R. Varughese; b. Acquisition of data: F. Costello; c. Analysis and interpretation of data: F. Costello, K. Skolnik, J. Sarna, and R. Varughese. Category 2: a. Drafting the manuscript: F. Costello, K. Skolnik, J. Sarna, and R. Varughese; b. Revising it for intellectual content: F. Costello, K. Skolnik, J. Sarna, and R. Varughese. Category 3: a. Final approval of the completed manuscript: F. Costello, K. Skolnik, J. Sarna, and R. Varughese.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,114
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,363

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,057
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologyMême sujetCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisTravaux en français237 207