Inferred spring discharge characteristics of the Saguenay River, Quebec between ca. 1850 and ca. 1900 based on sediment texture proxy data
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study explores the potential of sediment textural variation as a proxy for spring freshet magnitude variation of the Saguenay River using fine sand to fine silt fractions that have been preserved in Saguenay River prodelta sediments deposited in the northwestern sector of the Saguenay Fiord's North Arm. High sedimentation rates and particulate organic matter fluxes have created a poorly oxygenated seafloor environment in parts of the North Arm that is virtually free of bioturbating organisms thereby facilitating the preservation of identifiable yearly increments of sediment that accumulate mostly during the River's annual spring freshet. A particle size (2.3 to 6.3 phi i.e., 0.220 mm to 0.013 mm) median diameter (MD) proxy of spring freshet magnitude determined at one cm intervals in a piston core collected in 1982 reflects year-to-year variability of the River's spring freshet magnitude during the 19th and most of the 20th century. This study focuses on the second half of the 19th century during which MD data records an estimated 19 year long interval of relatively small MD's (LMDI) that is estimated to have occurred between ~1871 and ~1888. Compared to the later decades of the 20th century MD record, the second half of the 19th century and the early part of the 20th century to about 1912 shows a relatively higher frequency of larger average MD that appears to imply a more frequent occurrence of stronger spring freshet intervals of comparatively lower temporal variability. Within the 1850 - 1912 interval, the MD proxy suggests a generally decreasing freshet magnitude trend from ~1865 to ~1871 that is followed by the LMDI period of reduced freshet magnitudes featuring MDs that are typically less than 55 um. The LMDI is succeeded by a generally increasing MD sequence suggestive of stronger freshets that persists until about 1912. An explanation for the apparent relatively low freshet magnitudes and low year-to-year variability of spring freshets during the LMDI in relation to previous and following decades is tentatively assigned to lesser amounts of snowfall during January and April and to relatively warmer January and February temperatures acting in concert with relatively lower March and April temperatures. These seasonal conditions show a general correspondence to warm (positive) Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation (AMO) phases that occurred between 1860 and 1891. In contrast, during the 20th century, cool (negative) AMO phases seem to be linked to intervals that include some of the highest recorded 20th century Saguenay River freshets witnessed in the 1970's. An analysis of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)/MD relationship yielded mixed results. Not surprisingly, contradicting results also emerged in a comparison of AMO and NAO phases with respect to late 19th century local newspaper weather reports. In general, cooler spring and fall weather and stormy conditions were often associated with negative AMO conditions and with both positive and negative NAO's.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».