MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2981711325 · doi:10.1111/nin.12326

Nursing now or never

2019· editorial· en· W2981711325 sur OpenAlexaff
Sally Thorne

Notice bibliographique

RevueNursing Inquiry · 2019
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineNursing
ThématiqueNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNursingDeclarationHealth careMedicinePublic healthHealth policyPolitical sciencePublic relationsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

With the World Health Organization's declaration of 2020 as the Year of the Nurse and Midwife (World Health Organization, 2018), we are on the brink of an unprecedented opportunity to make significant inroads toward positioning nursing in more powerful ways within our various national and regional health care service delivery and strategic transformation initiatives. To coincide with this opportunity, the Burdett Trust for Nursing and the International Council of Nurses have collaborated in launching Nursing Now—a 3-year campaign to raise the status and profile the profession (International Council of Nurses, n.d.; 2019). Not only will we celebrate the contribution our discipline makes to the health and well-being of populations worldwide, but we will also be working toward enacting public and health policy globally from a nursing perspective. With health services under severe strain everywhere, there is a growing consensus that we need to move from a 'bio-medical' focus on treating disease to a more people-centred approach, collaborating with the patient to focus on disease prevention and healthy living rather than just dishing out drugs. Nurses are already leading this paradigm shift (2018, para.6). To effect these kinds of structural and attitudinal changes, we need to ‘raise the profile of nursing and make it central to health policy’ (Crisp, 2016, p. 5). Nursing has a marvelously complicated tradition of working quietly in the background and deflecting credit for outcomes onto other disciplines and components of the health care system. Despite being theoretically committed to relational practice, we routinely allow ourselves to be functionally interchangeable within our work, by setting up systems of care within which we become moveable parts. We believe in our hearts that the care we deliver makes a powerful difference for patients and families, and yet we can rarely document it within the kinds of objective, biometric evidence-based organizational accounting systems that have grown up around us. And for the most part, despite a concerted effort in qualitative and mixed methods research, we have not yet found creative and strategic ways to document that which nursing contributes to the health and healing of so many of our patients. Most of us shy away from public engagement, and we are much more reluctant than our colleagues within the interdisciplinary health team to take the microphone, stand in the spotlight, and showcase our contributions. Political intelligence, media training, and strategic evidence building are not yet routine parts of our disciplinary education, even at the postgraduate and leadership levels. The benefits - for all of us - are clear. Studies in several countries have shown that when nurses are trained and given greater scope to expand their roles, they deliver impressive results for patients. However, beyond this, health leaders must listen to nurses and invest in new models of care if they are to get the most out of this most precious resource (2018, para.13). So with the world lining up to celebrate nurses and give us our moment in the limelight, will we truly capitalize on this unprecedented opportunity? Or will we just congratulate ourselves, enjoy the immediate glow of recognition, and go back to our characteristic ways of engaging. I sincerely hope that we can collectively step up to face our challenges (whether political, relational, structural, attitudinal, or evidentiary) and use this incredible alignment of the stars as nursing's catalyst for action. Many of us live our lives and enact our careers with a profound confidence in the inherent value of nursing to people, communities, societies, and the planet. We know what nurses can be when they do what they do best. And, we know what a powerful impact great nursing makes on the world—in the critical moments of a human life, in the ideas and values that capture the public imagination and in the policy directions that coalesce a profound theoretical insight with an opportune political opening. As we embrace the promise of Nursing Now, we must ensure that no public figure gets elected without being fully informed by nurses about policy priorities from a nursing perspective, that no nursing student enters practice without a well-developed set of advocacy and leadership tools, that no nursing manager is thwarted from enacting support and mentorship systems for nurses by nurses through all stages of a career. Let us do what we can to support the conditions for practice excellence for every nurse, regardless of the field of practice, and let us work to make sure that every person in our societies who could directly benefit from the knowledge and skills of nursing has access to them. This truly is a once in a generation opportunity to place what we know and believe at the center of global and national attention. Let us ensure that we get it right.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,382
Écart entre enseignants0,324 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNursing InquiryMême sujetNursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipTravaux en français237 207