5 Year Follow Up Evaluation of a Third Generation Fixed Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty with an Intramedullary Tibial Component and a Central Sulcus Talus
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Category: Ankle Arthritis, Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has been shown to be a viable option in the treatment of end stage ankle arthritis (ESAA). Early reports demonstrated good results with intramedullary fixation implants. Third generation implants of this kind added a central sulcus to the talar component. This is a report of clinical follow up data from a prospectively collected database at a single US institution using a Third generation fixed bearing total ankle arthroplasty implant with a stemmed tibial component and a talar component with a central sulcus. To our knowledge, this is the first report of 5 year follow up data for this implant. Methods: Patients undergoing primary TAA at a single institution by one of four fellowship trained orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons with a Third generation fixed bearing implant consisting of an intramedullary stemmed tibial component and a sulcus talus that were at least 5 years postoperative were reviewed from a prospectively collected database. These patients were followed at regular intervals with history, physical examination and radiographs. All ankles were classified using the Canadian Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) End-Stage Ankle Arthritis Classification System. The primary outcome was implant survivability. Secondary outcomes included pre- and postoperative coronal plane radiographic alignment, evaluation for osteolysis, and failure mode when applicable. All reoperation events were recorded using the COFAS Reoperations Coding System (CROCS). Results: 126 TAA with this implant were performed in 124 patients between 2010 and 2013; 74 met inclusion criteria for our study. The mean age at surgery was 61.6 +- 10.0 years (range 38.7-84.3). Four patients died with their initial implants in place. The mean duration of follow up for living patients that retained both initial components at final follow-up was 6.2 +- .9 years (range 4.7-8.1 years). 35% (26 of 74) of ankles had a preoperative coronal plane deformity of at least 10 degrees. 11% (8 of 74) of the ankles had a preoperative coronal plane deformity of at least 20 degrees. There were 6 (8%) implant failures that occurred at a mean 2.0 +- 1.4 years postoperative. Two failures were due to deep infection. One failure was related to talar component subsidence. All failures occurred in patients with =preoperative coronal plane deformity of less than 5 degrees. 81% (60 of 74) of TAA had no reoperation events in the follow up period. Conclusion: This cohort of TAA patients with minimum 5 year follow up using a third generation fixed bearing implant demonstrates acceptable implant survival, improved reoperation rates, and maintenance of coronal plane alignment. These data also suggest tolerance of a larger preoperative deformity with improved implant design. Continued follow up and reporting is needed to ensure that these favorable outcomes are maintained. Additionally, further investigation on acceptable coronal plane alignment correction with TAA is needed to determine the possible limitations of this procedure.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».