MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2982391295 · doi:10.1215/00182168-7787489

Black British Migrants in Cuba: Race, Labor, and Empire in the Twentieth-Century Caribbean, 1898–1948

2019· article· en· W2982391295 sur OpenAlexaff
Robert Whitney

Notice bibliographique

RevueHispanic American Historical Review · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCuban History and Society
Établissements canadiensUniversity of New Brunswick
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipNothingPoliticsGender studiesCaribbean artHistoryBlack BritishEmpireResistance (ecology)Race (biology)EthnologyGenealogySociologyPolitical scienceLawAncient history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Book reviewers should be reticent about using the terms “definitive” or “comprehensive” to describe a work of scholarship. After all, no matter the topic, there will always be something new to say, more sources will come to light, and new research methodologies will make us reevaluate past interpretations. But, in very rare cases, a book is published that sets such a high standard of scholarship that not only does it surpass all previous work on a topic, but nothing new can be said without reading it. Jorge Giovannetti-Torres's book Black British Migrants in Cuba is such a work. Earlier studies discuss particular aspects of black British Caribbean migration to, and life in, Cuba. But Giovannetti-Torres's book is the definitive and most comprehensive work on black British migration to Cuba because no other work provides a comprehensive and nuanced analysis of why black British subjects went to Cuba, where they settled and worked, how they interacted with Cuban society at local and regional levels, the racialized politics surrounding intra-Caribbean migration, and how black British migrants interacted with British imperial authorities. Grounded in extensive and rigorous research in Cuba, the British Caribbean, England, and the United States, this book examines the multifaceted migration experiences of Jamaicans, Leeward Islanders, and Windward Islanders as well as the transnational processes of labor recruitment. Equally important, Black British Migrants in Cuba provides a brilliant analysis of the oppositional and resistance strategies employed by British Antilleans, showing how migrants were determined to work, live, and survive in Cuba with dignity. This book is therefore much more than Cuban history. It is equally a history of Cuba's deep and complex connections with the wider Caribbean. Black British Migrants in Cuba is essential reading for anyone interested in Cuban and Caribbean history, diaspora studies, labor migration, modern plantation life, and British and US imperial history in the Caribbean.Black British Migrants in Cuba has ten well-written and well-organized chapters. After providing excellent historical context in chapters 1 and 2, Giovannetti-Torres discusses in other chapters the political and economic situation in Cuba between 1898 and 1917, the limits of British imperial support for migrants, Cuban racial politics surrounding migrant labor, and the Cuban government's forced repatriations of black British subjects after 1937 (discussed in two chapters). The book ends with a thoughtful reflection about race, nation, and empire.Space does not permit a thorough treatment of this book's many contributions. For this reviewer, there are two main ones worth highlighting that link the entire narrative. First, Black British Migrants in Cuba is an exemplary study of what Giovannetti-Torres calls “unbound history,” by which he means that the people at the center of the narrative were constantly traveling through and negotiating the multiple spaces and boundaries of company plantations, islands, nation-states, and imperial states (p. 15). To be sure, to what degree this migration was voluntary or coerced very much depended on particular circumstances and historical contingencies. But as much as people's lives were shaped by the oppressive realities of poverty, under- or unemployment, and national and imperial policies that restricted their freedom, black British migrants found countless ways to assert their own agency in the face of circumstances largely out of their control. Other works on intra-Caribbean migration have certainly made some important observations about this unbound history, but none have come close to Giovannetti-Torres's sophisticated analysis and wide-ranging research that details precisely how, when, and why particular groups of migrants went to Cuba and how, when, and why they lived and worked in particular places.This emphasis on the unbound history of black British migrants leads to the second main contribution of this work. Previous studies have noted that the experiences of Jamaicans, Leeward Islanders, Windward Islanders, and British colonial subjects who went to Cuba from Central America were different. But Black British Migrants in Cuba stands out because readers will obtain clear and empirically grounded explanations as to why and how the experiences of black British migrants varied according to place of origin. Economic and political circumstances varied considerably throughout the Caribbean, and much of the existing scholarship makes too many broad—and frequently false—generalizations about the diaspora experience in Cuba. Not only does Giovannetti-Torres's analysis and impressive work in archives throughout the Caribbean inform readers about the complexities of the migration experience in Cuba and the Caribbean, but his research methodology will certainly inspire scholars who work on other diaspora networks beyond the Caribbean.It is worth noting that Black British Migrants in Cuba joins another recent definitive and comprehensive work, on Haitian migration to Cuba, by Matthew Casey, Empire's Guestworkers: Haitian Migrants in Cuba during the Age of US Occupation. These books should be read together. By doing so, readers will get a glimpse of the very best scholarship on Cuba and the Caribbean.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,734
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,536

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,002
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHispanic American Historical ReviewMême sujetCuban History and SocietyTravaux en français237 207