AN EXAMINATION OF WHY SASKATCHEWAN WOMEN CHOOSE MASTECTOMY VERSUS BREAST CONSERVATION THERAPY IN EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCER
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction and Research Purpose\nBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in North America and the second most common cause of cancer death in women. For early stage breast cancer (ESBC), it is well established that breast conservation therapy (BCT) and mastectomy are equivalent treatments for survival. Treatment for ESBC can therefore be viewed as preference sensitive care, where decision-making between treatment options should vary according to patient preferences. In Canada, interprovincial mastectomy rates vary greatly from 25% to 68% between provinces with a national average of 38%. Saskatchewan has consistently reported the nation’s second highest mastectomy rate with the latest report showing 63%. There has been international research investigating why women choose mastectomy versus BCT, but there is limited data within Canada to explain these provincial variations. The aim of my thesis is to better understand Saskatchewan women’s choice between mastectomy and BCT in ESBC. In this dissertation, I have addressed the research objectives through four manuscripts outlined below\n\nManuscript 1:\nTo assess the current evidence, we conducted the first systematic review on the factors influencing women’s choice of mastectomy versus BCT in ESBC.\n\nManuscript 2:\nTo identify the factors that influence Saskatchewan women’s choice between BCT or mastectomy in ESBC, we conducted a province-based qualitative study which identified themes and subthemes influencing therapy choice. This was the first part of an exploratory mixed methods study.\n\nManuscript 3:\nTo help improve our understanding and organize our research, we created a conceptual framework of why women choose mastectomy versus BCT in ESBC. This framework was important in organizing our systematic review and guiding our survey.\n\nManuscript 4:\nFinally, to understand decision-making influences of Saskatchewan women with ESBC, we conducted a province wide survey. Creation of this survey was grounded on our previous work and the second portion of our mixed methods study.\n\nResults and Conclusion\nOur research demonstrates treatment choices for Saskatchewan women with ESBC were primarily influenced by disease stage and individual belief factors. These findings would suggest that women are making their treatment choices predominantly based on individual values and preferences. The use of mastectomy and BCT rates as an indicator of quality of care may be misleading. Instead, a shift in attention towards patient-centred care is more appropriate.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».