MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2983529065 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-123720

Efficacy of Caplacizumab in Patients with aTTP in the HERCULES Study According to Baseline Disease Severity

2019· article· en· W2983529065 sur OpenAlexaff
Paul Coppo, Spero R. Cataland, Flora Peyvandi, Paul Knoebl, Marie Scully, Johanna A. Kremer Hovinga, Ara Metjian, Javier de la Rubia, Katerina Pavenski, Hilde De Winter, R. Sousa, Filip Callewaert

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueComplement system in diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicinePlaceboGastroenterologyStroke (engine)Pathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP) is a rare, life-threatening autoimmune thrombotic microangiopathy that involves abnormal processing of von-Willebrand factor (vWF) and results in multiple organ dysfunction. Although aTTP remains a very unpredictable disease, risk factors for death include older age, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels >10x the upper limit of normal (ULN), and cerebral involvement (i.e., the French severity score) (Benhamou et al. Haematologica 2012;97:1181-1186). In addition, raised cardiac troponin-I (cTnI) levels of >2.5 µg/L have also been linked with a higher risk of mortality or refractoriness (Benhamou et al. J Thromb Haemost 2015;13:293-302). In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 HERCULES study, patients with aTTP were randomized to placebo or caplacizumab, plus daily therapeutic plasma exchange and immunosuppression. This analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of caplacizumab in patients participating in HERCULES according to baseline disease severity. Methods: In the HERCULES study, very severe disease was defined as: a French severity score ≥3, orsevere neurological involvement (i.e. coma, seizures, focal deficit), orcardiac involvement (cTnI >2.5xULN) All of these factors have independently been associated with worse outcomes and higher mortality. The French severity score is a discrete score from 0 to 4, involving evaluation of 3 parameters: Cerebral involvement: yes=1; no=0LDH: >10xULN=1; ≤10xULN=0Age: >60 years=2; >40 and ≤60 years=1; ≤40 years=0 Scores ≥3 indicate very severe disease. Data from patients participating in HERCULES were extracted and analyzed according to less severe/very severe disease and are presented descriptively. Results: Overall efficacy outcomes according to baseline disease severity are presented in Table 1. Patients who presented with less severe disease at baseline had a similar risk of mortality compared with patients who presented with very severe disease. Similar trends were observed for other clinically relevant outcomes, such as exacerbations of aTTP and refractoriness. Treatment with caplacizumab improved outcomes in both patient subgroups. Irrespective of disease severity, caplacizumab treatment resulted in faster platelet count normalization and a lower proportion of patients experiencing the composite endpoint of TTP-related death, exacerbation of TTP, or treatment-emergent major thromboembolic event during the double-blind treatment period. No patients who received caplacizumab died, while deaths occurred in 1 (2.1%) and 2 patients (8.0%) in the less severe and very severe subgroups of patients who received placebo, respectively. No patients receiving caplacizumab developed refractory disease, whereas 1 (2.1%) and 2 placebo-treated patients (8.0%) with less severe and very severe disease, respectively, developed refractory disease. Conclusions: aTTP can be unpredictable, and, although this analysis included a small patient population, our results suggest that patients with less severe disease at baseline are equally at risk of death, refractoriness and exacerbations as patients with very severe disease. A clear treatment benefit was observed in all patients who received caplacizumab irrespective of disease severity at baseline, which highlights the importance of starting therapy early in all patients with aTTP. Table 1. Overall efficacy outcomes according to baseline disease severity in the HERCULES study, during the double-blind treatment period. Table 1 Disclosures Coppo: Shire: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy. Cataland:Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Research Funding. Peyvandi:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Honoraria; Grifols: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Research Funding. Knoebl:Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy; Novo-Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy; CSL-Behring: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Scully:Novartis: Consultancy; Shire: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy; Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy. Kremer Hovinga:Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Honoraria go to employer (Insel Gruppe AG, Department of Hematology); Roche: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria go to employer (Insel Gruppe AG, Department of Hematology); Shire: Consultancy, Other: Honoraria go to employer (Insel Gruppe AG, Department of Hematology), Research Funding; CSL-Behring: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria go to employer (Insel Gruppe AG, Department of Hematology); Siemens: Honoraria, Other: Honoraria go to employer (Insel Gruppe AG, Department of Hematology). Metjian:AblynxNV/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. De La Rubia:Takeda: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Pavenski:Shire: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Research Funding; Ablynx: Honoraria, Research Funding. De Winter:Ablynx, a Sanofi company: Employment. de Passos Sousa:Sanofi: Employment. Callewaert:Sanofi (formerly employed by Ablynx, a Sanofi company): Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,319

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetComplement system in diseasesTravaux en français237 207