MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2985115696 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-123081

Describing the Point Prevalence and Characteristics of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

2019· article· en· W2985115696 sur OpenAlexaff
Brandon Tse, Gloria Lim, Michelle Sholzberg, Katerina Pavenski

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueComplement system in diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraPulmonary embolismRituximabDeep veinThrombosisMicroangiopathic hemolytic anemiaADAMTS13PopulationInternal medicineWarfarinSchistocyteSurgeryVenous thrombosisPediatricsAtrial fibrillationPlatelet

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) presents with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and microvascular thrombosis. Arterial thromboembolic events are relatively common and well-described in these patients. However, the literature describing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this patient population is scarce and outdated. We hypothesize that patients with TTP are at greater risk for VTE due to the use of central venous catheters and use of solvent-detergent plasma (SDP) for plasma exchange (PLEX). Methods: Eligible patients from a single tertiary care centre were identified through apheresis records, and a retrospective chart review was conducted. The criteria for TTP diagnosis included the presence of accepted clinical/laboratory criteria and ADAMTS13 activity <10%. We considered the diagnosis of VTE if any of the following were present: pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). Data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics. Institutional research ethics board approval was obtained. Results: We identified 77 consecutive patients with 123 episodes of TTP between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018. 51 patients (66%) were female, and 74 (96%) had immune TTP. Standard of care was daily PLEX and high-dose steroids, while rituximab was used for relapsed/refractory disease. In addition, 6 patients received caplacizumab. 13 of the 77 patients (17%) experienced a VTE (14 events: 6 PE, 5 DVT, 3 SVT), all of which were acute and associated with admission for either first presentation or relapse of TTP. None of the VTEs were catheter related. 8/13 patients were female, and all had immune TTP. Median age at diagnosis of VTE was 45 years (IQR: 36.0-56.5 years). 10/14 events were symptomatic; diagnosis was confirmed a median of 1.5 days after VTE symptom onset (IQR: 1-3 days). All patients were treated with PLEX, receiving a median of 17 exchanges (IQR: 10-23 exchanges). In addition, 13/14 TTP episodes were treated with corticosteroids, 9 with rituximab, and no patients received caplacizumab. 8 patients experienced a VTE while receiving daily PLEX; the majority (6/8) were being exchanged with SDP. VTE was diagnosed a median of 13.5 days after initiation of PLEX (IQR: 9.2-23.5 days). At TTP presentation, median platelet count was 11 x 109/L (IQR: 7-16 x 109/L), and median LDH was 894 U/L (IQR: 508-1272 U/L). At VTE diagnosis, the median platelet and LDH levels were 170 x 109/L (IQR: 126-248 x 109/L), and 232 U/L (IQR: 176-254 U/L) respectively. No patients had D-dimer testing at VTE symptom onset or diagnosis. Of the 6 patients with PE, 3 had elevated troponin levels (>0.040 ug/L) at VTE diagnosis. In terms of VTE risk factors, median BMI was 30.0 (IQR: 28.7-32.1); the majority of patients (7/13) were obese (BMI>30). 4/13 patients were active cigarette smokers. No patients had a history of lupus or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. 2 patients had a past history of VTE, one was associated with a prior TTP episode. Most VTEs (8/14) occurred while patients were not on any pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. For the remaining patients, dalteparin (3), ASA (2) and rivaroxaban (1) were used. VTE events were treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including rivaroxaban and apixaban, in 10 cases. 7 of these patients were started on a DOAC after a brief initial period of low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin, 3 patients were given DOAC as upfront therapy. 4 cases were treated with warfarin (3 bridged with heparin and 1 following rivaroxaban). One distal DVT was not treated. None of the VTEs were fatal. Discussion: The point prevalence of VTE was 17% over one decade amongst patients with TTP; this is higher than previously reported in the literature. Our data also suggests that TTP patients may be at greater risk for VTE compared to general hospitalized medical patients. The majority of affected patients on PLEX were receiving SDP at VTE diagnosis. SDP contains reduced levels of proteins C and S and may have a pro-thrombotic effect. Almost all VTEs occurred after platelet recovery and normalization of hemolytic markers, suggesting a different pathophysiology than arterial thrombosis in this setting. VTE thromboprophylaxis was uncommon since it was often held due to thrombocytopenia and not resumed upon platelet recovery. Our findings suggest the need to implement VTE thromboprophylaxis earlier in patients admitted with TTP. Disclosures Sholzberg: Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pavenski:Ablynx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria; Octapharma: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,386

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,200
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetComplement system in diseasesTravaux en français237 207