MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2985531343 · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000000520

Ventricular tachycardia as the initial symptom of cardiac hydatidosis

2019· article· en· W2985531343 sur OpenAlexaff
Yanmei Lu, Ling Zhang, Qiang Xing, Xianhui Zhou, Yaodong Li, Jianghua Zhang, Zukela Tuerhong, Baopeng Tang

Notice bibliographique

RevueChinese Medical Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueParasitic infections in humans and animals
Établissements canadiensCAE (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCardiologyInternal medicinePalpitationsVentricular tachycardiaChest painThrombusElectrocardiographyTachycardia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: A 44-year-old female presented at the local hospital for repeated episodes of having palpitations, accompanied with cold sweats, amaurosis, vomiting, and limb weakness in the previous 2 months. An electrocardiogram indicated “ventricular tachycardia” when she was not feeling well. The symptoms alleviated significantly after injections of “amiodarone” (dose unknown), after which the patient was discharged. A local physician recommended ablation, so the patient was transferred to our hospital. The patient was generally healthy and had lived in a region with pastures. According to the patient’ self-report, she had been diagnosed as having liver hydatidosis 30 years ago, but had recovered after surgical treatment at the local hospital. Furthermore, the patient claimed to have no other medical history. No hematological abnormality was found after admission but 24-h Holter monitoring indicated frequent premature ventricular contractions. Color Doppler echocardiography suggested significant attenuation of contraction at the apex of the ventricular septum, with apical thrombus. After admission, a definite diagnosis was confirmed with the help of an electrocardiogram: ventricular tachycardia [Figure 1A]. There was no symptomatic recurrent ventricular tachycardia, but ST segment depression and T wave inversion were observed in the electrocardiograph trace from the anterior wall lead, and cardiac ultrasound suggested attenuation of contraction at the apex of the ventricular septum with apical thrombus [Figure 1B]. Coronary computed tomography angiogram suggested that the coronary vessels and their lumens were normal, clearly eliminating the possibility of coronary heart disease. The principal question was about the origin of this thrombus and whether primary cardiomyopathy was suspected. To ascertain the condition of the myocardium, myocardial perfusion imaging was performed. The results indicated reverse movement of the apical wall of the left ventricle, formation of a ventricular aneurysm at the apex of the left ventricle, and anterior wall, anterior-lateral wall, posterior-lateral wall proximal to the apex, and ventricular septal myocardial infarction. The imaging technicians recommended positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning to evaluate the condition of the viable myocardium. From the results of the emission computed tomography (ECT) scan and the patient's clinical manifestations, primary cardiomyopathy was excluded. Coronary heart disease was not considered as the cause of the symptoms and further PET-CT scanning to evaluate the viable myocardium was not recommended. Furthermore, there was a strong suspicion that the results of the ECT scan and cardiac ultrasonography were incorrect. The causes of the attenuated myocardial contraction, formation of the apical thrombus, and nature of the mass required clarification. Thus, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used for further investigation.Figure 1: Examination results of the patient. (A) ST segment depression and T wave inversion from the anterior wall lead of a normal ECG; tachycardic ECG indicated ventricular capture and atrioventricular dissociation, leading to a definitive diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia. (B) Cardiac ultrasound suggested attenuation of contraction at the apex of the ventricular septum with apical thrombus. (C) The white arrow suggests an irregular plump patcky “egg-shell” margin and a calcified cyst adhering to both normal and thin myocardium. (D) The figure suggests a mass at the left ventricular apex, affecting the myocardium proximal to the apex at the anterior, anterior-lateral and posterior-lateral walls, a ventricular septum and additionally suggests adhesion of the outer membrane and pericardium. ECG: Electrocardiograph.Myocardial magnetic plain scanning indicated significant thinning of the ventricular septum and apical myocardium. Enhanced scans suggested the presence of a cystic mass at the posterior apex of the left ventricle, no significant abnormal enhancement of enhanced lesions, with dimensions of the transverse section being 6.17 cm × 4.67 cm, all of which were consistent with manifestations of cardiac cystic hydatidosis. Due to the patient's history of hepatic echinococcosis, it was concluded that the apical mass was hydatidosis when other aspects of the medical history were considered.[1] The hydatid cysts had attacked the ventricular septum and apical myocardium, causing adhesion of the outer membrane to the pericardium, which was the actual cause of the ventricular tachycardia. Enhanced abdominal CT was subsequently performed to investigate the presence of hydatidosis at other anatomical locations, the results revealing hepatic degenerative hydatidosis (multi ascomycete). The apex of the heart was within the scanning range of CT, and a low-density oval shadow was clearly seen, and eggshell calcification observed on the outer wall [Figure 1C], further confirming that the patient was suffering degenerative cardiac hydatidosis. Thus, the patient was definitively diagnosed as having cardiac hydatidosis with hepatic hydatidosis, ventricular tachycardia occurring recurrently due to the hydatid cyst-invasion of the myocardium. Therefore, thoracotomy was suggested for its removal.[2] The patient was transferred to the Department of Cardiac Surgery for “partial pericardial excision and hydatid cystectomy” [Figure 1D]. The patient's condition was monitored closely after surgery but no ventricular tachycardia was identified. Four months after the removal of the cardiac cyst, the hepatic hydatid cysts were removed. No symptomatic ventricular tachycardia was observed during the 16-month follow-up. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained the patient consent form. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Funding This work was supported by a grant from the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFC0900905). Conflicts of interest None.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,055
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,318 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChinese Medical JournalMême sujetParasitic infections in humans and animalsTravaux en français237 207