MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2985638537 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-130332

Quantitative Modeling of Azacitidine Resistance in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome Identifies Distinct Phenotypes of Disease Progression: Evidence for the Presence of a Disease Versus Native Clone Effect

2019· article· en· W2985638537 sur OpenAlexaff
Roman M. Shapiro, Adam R. Stinchcombe

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMyelodysplastic syndromesAzacitidineBone marrowHaematopoiesisInternational Prognostic Scoring Systemclone (Java method)ImmunologyLeukemiaDiseaseOncologyStem cellMedicineBiologyInternal medicineGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients who are treated with azacitidine (AZA) may develop drug resistance in a number of different ways. Distinguishing the mechanisms underlying disease progression to leukemia while on AZA as opposed to clonal evolution without an increasing blast count is challenging due to the difficulty of studying MDS clones and their effect on non-diseased hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). The application of a robust mathematical model of hematopoiesis to MDS patients allows for the calculation of kinetic parameters reflective of the function of the dominant hematopoietic clones, and infers the behaviour of both HSCs and MDS clones. We demonstrate the application of such a model applied to IPSS int-2/hi risk MDS patients treated with AZA, and show how different natural histories of disease can be explained by changes in model parameters over time. We also demonstrate how interactions between modeled HSCs and MDS clones can be inferred from the model. Methods A database of 97 IPSS int-2/hi risk MDS patients treated with AZA was previously constructed containing longitudinal peripheral blood count and laboratory data during the period 2008-2016, and was used for model fitting. Of these patients, 79 patients had sufficient data for modeling. A mathematical model of hematopoiesis was developed based on a formulation by Colijn and Mackey and modified to include a bone marrow blast compartment. Hematopoietic kinetic parameters were fit to de-identified patient laboratory data using a Kalman filter. The model data input was adjusted for red blood cell and platelet transfusion frequency and weighted so that parameter fits were made insensitive to periods of acute illness as identified from chart review and ancillary laboratory values. The resulting fit parameters represented a weighted average of disease and native HSCs contributions. Model parameters were evaluated with respect to time and sensitivity analysis was done identifying optimal correlation with the development of AZA resistance. A novel analysis was developed to determine if the contributions of the native and disease HSCs to peripheral blood counts are in proportion to their clonal burdens, or if the AZA-resistant phenotype reflected an additional effect of the MDS clones on the native HSCs. Results A schematic of the improved model of hematopoiesis adapted to MDS is shown along with the distribution of data collected over time (Fig 1A-B). The model fits for three representative patients are shown with different disease courses: AZA resistance with a rapidly rising blast count (patient 90), AZA resistance with a minimal rise in the blast count (patient 86), and AZA resistance with cytogenetic evolution without an increase in the blast count (patient 74). The model was fit to the longitudinal peripheral blood counts and bone marrow blast count data (Fig 2A-D). Development of AZA resistance in patient 74 was best correlated with a reduction in the average HSC self-renewal time (τS in Fig 2E), and this reduction was related to disease burden in a linear manner (Fig 2F, leftmost panel). Similarly, the development of AZA resistance in patient 86 was best correlated with an increase in the intrinsic threshold rate at which a stem cell differentiates (k0 in Fig 2E), and this increase was related to disease burden in a non-linear manner (Fig 2F, middle panel). For patient 90, the development of AZA resistance was best correlated with a decrease in the maximum rate of HSC differentiation (f0 in Fig 2E), and this decrease was related to disease burden in a non-linear manner (Fig 2F, rightmost panel). Discussion MDS patients in our cohort developed AZA resistance in distinct ways, and this correlated with changes in either HSC self-renewal time, differentiation threshold, or maximum differentiation rate. In the former case, the linearity in modeled HSC self-renewal time with respect to disease burden suggested this parameter change is accounted for by an expanding MDS clone. In the latter two cases, the mechanism of AZA resistance is hypothesized to be associated with an increased MDS clone threshold for differentiation as well as decreased maximum rate of HSC differentiation. The non-linearity of the association between these rate changes and disease burden suggests they were driven in large part by an external influence from the MDS clone on the HSCs. Further validation of these findings in a larger cohort of MDS patients is anticipated. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,323
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→