Risk of Thrombosis in Adult Philadelphia-Positive ALL Treated with an Asparaginase-Free Pediatric-Inspired ALL Regimen with Imatinib
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receiving asparaginase (ASNase) based therapy. The MD Anderson Cancer Centre reported an overall VTE incidence of 29% (14/49) in patients with Philadelphia positive ALL (Ph+ ALL) treated with Hyper-CVAD and in the absence of ASNase (Vu et al. Cancer Medicine. 2015;4(1):27-35. doi:10.1002/cam4.332). The VTE incidence in adult Ph+ ALL patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus the pediatric-inspired regimen modified from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL protocol remains unclear. We have previously compared the incidence of VTE in adults with Ph+ ALL treated with or without ASNase during the intensification phase of the modified DFCI treatment. This study suggested that patients with Ph+ve ALL experience high incidence of VTE, even in the absence of ASNase, and that this risk is not restricted to the intensification phase. As ASNase was omitted from the protocol due to toxicity since 2008, in this report, we provide further insight into the risk of VTE in adults with Ph+ ALL during the entire ASNase-free DFCI treatment course. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of sequential Ph+ ALL patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) from 2008-2018 with an imatinib-containing DFCI protocol-based regimen that omitted ASNase. VTE events were recorded from the time of diagnosis to the end of modified DFCI treatment, including at the time of allogenic bone marrow transplantation. Co-variants of age, sex, weight, BMI, Padua score, white blood cell count, and platelet count were also collected. Statistical analyses were performed using the 2-tailed t test. Results: Overall, 130 patients were included for analysis; none received prophylactic anticoagulation. Among the 130 Ph+ ALL patients treated with the modified DFCI protocol, 28 (21.5%) patients had at least 1 VTE events from diagnosis to the end of treatment. The mean age of patients with and without VTE were 56.8 and 49.0 years, respectively (p=0.014) (Table 1). The majority of the VTE events occurred during active treatment, with 9 (7.0%), 11 (8.5%), and 4 (3.1%) occurring during induction, intensification, and maintenance, respectively (Figure 1). Only four patients (3.1%) presented with VTE at the time of diagnosis. Of all VTE events, 14 (50%) were DVT and/or PE, 12 (43%) were line-related, and 2 (7%) involved a cardiac thrombus (Table 2). The average Padua score for these patients was 5.4 with a range of 3-10. All VTE events were treated with low weight molecular heparin (LMWH), with 2 patients experiencing a recurrent episode within a year while on LMWH treatment. Bleeding following anticoagulation was rare. One patient experienced a major bleeding into the psoas muscle while on LMWH plus platelet transfusion for a right atrial clot during the induction phase in ICU. No other significant bleeding event was observed. Conclusion: VTE was observed in more than 20% of adults with Ph+ ALL patients treated with imatinib plus a modified DFCI pediatric ALL protocol. The majority of VTE events occurred during active treatment (induction and intensification), and DVT/PE incidence was similar to that of line-related thrombosis. The high observed VTE incidence suggests that prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered for adult patients with Ph+ ALL even in ASNase-free regimens, especially if additional thromboembolic risk factors are present. Disclosures Maze: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chan:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Gupta:Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Yee:Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas, Celgene, Otsuka, Shire, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agensys, Astex, Hoffman La Roche, MedImmune, Merck, Millenium, Roche/Genentech: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Schimmer:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McNamara:Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».