Largest Single Center Experience Using Dual T-Cell Depletion with ATG and Ptcy for Gvhd Prophylaxis in Peripheral Blood RIC Allo-HSCT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Dual T-cell depletion with ATG and PTCy combined with cyclosporine (CsA) in peripheral blood (PB) reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HSCT results in an impressive control of clinically relevant GVHD. We aim to share the largest and unique single center experience using this novel GVHD combination in allo-HSCT for hematological malignancies. Methods Between October 2015 and April 2019, 365 consecutive adult recipients underwent PB RIC allo-HSCT. Conditioning regimen consisted on fludarabine, busulfan and 200 cGy of total body irradiation. For GVHD prophylaxis all cases received ATG, PTCy (50mg/kg/24h x 2 doses on day +3 and +4) and CsA since day +5. Two hundred fifty-nine (71%) recipients, transplanted between 2015 and May 2018, received a total dose of 4.5mg/kg of rabbit-ATG (given on day -3,-2 and -1). In May 2018, the protocol was reviewed and refined decreasing the dose of ATG to a total of 2mg/kg (given on day -3 and -2). A total of 106 (29%) recipients received the lowered dose of ATG. Data was collected retrospectively and updated on July 2019. Cumulative incidence (Cum.Inc) of GVHD, CMV and EBV reactivation analysis was assessed accounting relapse and death as competing events. The multivariate analysis for OS and RFS was controlled by the following significant variables in the univariate analysis: age at transplant, disease risk index (DRI) (low and moderate v's high and very high), Karnofsky performance status (>80% v's ≤80%), HCT-CI score ≥3 and donor type. Results Baseline characteristics and main post-transplant information and outcome are summarized in Table 1 and 2. The cum.Inc of grade II-IV and grade III-IV at day +100 was respectively 14% (95 confidence interval (CI) 11.1-18.4) and 4.7% (95% CI 2.8-7.2). The cum.Inc of moderate and severe chronic GVHD at 1 year was 13% (95% CI 9.7-16.8). ATG dose and donor type did not influence acute/chronic GVHD rates (Table 3). The cum.Inc of CMV and EBV reactivation at day +180 was comparable between the two cohorts that received different dose of ATG (P>0.05). However, in the cohort that received a lower dose of ATG (2mg/kg), no CMV disease was documented and the percentage of probable or proven EBV-post-transplant lymphoprolipherative disease (P/P-PTLD) was only 3.7%. The percentages of CMV disease and P/P-PTLD in the group that received a dose of ATG of 4.5 mg/kg were respective 4.6% and 8.8%. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and the cumulative incidence (cumInc) of acute GVHD of the entire cohort and according to the ATG dose are shown in the Table 2 and the Table 3. OS and RFS curves of all 365 patients and stratified according to donor type are shown in the Plots 1 to 4. In the multivariate analysis, age at transplant [(HR 1 (95% CI 1.01-1.02); P=0.046], high and very high DRI score [HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-3.6); P=0.001], KPS ≤80% [HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-2.7); P=0.001], and HCT-CI score ≥3 [HR 1.4 (95% CI 1.01-2.09); P=0.042] were significant risk factors for worse OS. Donor type was not a significant parameter for OS (P>0.05). In the multivariate analysis of risk factors for RFS, high DRI score [HR 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.4); P=0.002], and a KPS ≤80% prior allo-HSCT [HR 2 (95% CI 1.4-2.8); P<0.001] were significant risk factors for worse RFS. To receive grafts from a 10/10 MUD was a significant parameter for better RFS [HR 0.6 (95% CI 0.4-0.9); P=0.046]. Conclusions Dual T-cell depletion with ATG and PTCy provides an impressive control of GVHD with acceptable relapse rates using PB stem cell grafts independently of the donor type. This observation suggests that the present combination overcomes the HLA-barrier and its effect on GVHD. Acute GVHD rates are effectively controlled with a dose of ATG of only 2mg/kg when it is combined with PTCy and CsA. Further investigations need to be done to better define the efficacy of a lower dose of ATG controlling chronic GVHD in this setting. Further investigations and refinements need to be done to improve survival rates in those recipients with higher DRI score and worse KPS ≤80% prior transplantation. Disclosures Michelis: CSL Behring: Other: Financial Support. Mattsson:Gilead: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».