MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2986865196 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-131718

Patient Education Interventions for Improving Self-Management in Adults with Hemoglobinopathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019· review· en· W2986865196 sur OpenAlexaff
Maha Munawar, Richard Ward, Kate Uchendu, Rouhi Fazelzad, Janet Papadakos, Kevin H.M. Kuo

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMEDLINEMeta-analysisPsychological interventionPsycINFORandomized controlled trialSystematic reviewCochrane LibraryPhysical therapyPediatricsInternal medicinePsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Hemoglobinopathies, such as sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassemia, are chronic blood disorders with a profound impact on a patient's life expectancy and quality. Patients often come from marginalized populations with variable health literacy. Prior studies have demonstrated improved outcomes in chronic illness as a result of empowering patients through various education strategies. This systematic review investigates the current state of patient education for SCD and thalassemia with the goal of elucidating which strategies have been effective in improving patient knowledge and/or ability to cope with illness. METHODS Literature was searched up to August 2018 in Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, Emcare, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of patient education on patients aged 18 years and older or transitioning into adulthood were included. Psychological interventions were excluded. Preliminary analysis focused on three outcomes: disease knowledge, self-efficacy, and coping ability. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. A random effects model with the inverse variance method was chosen. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for continuous outcomes due to the different scales used by each study. Changes from baseline with missing standard deviations were imputed from known standard deviations from other studies (Higgins 2011). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Domain-based approach was used to assess risk of bias (Higgins 2011). RESULTS The search yielded 12173 citations, 3575 were duplicates. Two reviewers screened the title and abstracts for full text retrieval. Of the 28 full-text citations reviewed, 8 met the inclusion criteria, representing 6 unique RCTs. Of the 6 RCTs, 2 were at high risk of attrition bias. The other domains generally exhibited an unclear risk of bias. Improvement in patient knowledge was a measured outcome in 3 RCTs totalling 351 participants with SCD, mostly of African-American descent. Standard deviations (SD) were lacking in the baseline and 6 month knowledge questionnaire results from Krishnamurti 2018. Attempts to impute the SDs were unsuccessful. Meta-analysis was conducted in the remaining 2 RCTs (n=274). Statistically significant SMD of 0.39 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.72, p=0.02, Figure 1A) in favour of the intervention group with low heterogeneity (I2=24%). These interventions were delivered as either a web-based multimedia education program or in a classroom setting. An increase in self-efficacy was reported in 2 RCTs (n=67) with a statistically significant SMD of 0.72 (95% CI 0.22 to 1.22, p=0.005, Figure 1B) in favour of patient education with no observed statistical heterogeneity (I2=0). Coping ability was reported in 2 RCTs (n=107) but one study was excluded from analysis due to lack of sufficient randomization data. For the remaining study (n=40), the SMD at 0.16 was not statistically significant (95% CI -0.46 to 0.78, p=0.60, Figure 1C). CONCLUSIONS This review summarizes the current state of patient education for adult hemoglobinopathy patients in which some efforts have been made for SCD but no comparable interventions exist for thalassemia. Interventions demonstrated a significant effect on improvement in knowledge and self-efficacy. However, this effect is of uncertain clinical significance due to lack of reporting on clinically relevant illness and healthcare utilization-related outcomes. Only one RCT adequately reported on improvement in coping ability with no statistical significance. Given these results, there is currently insufficient evidence to determine what intervention strategies might benefit adult patients with hemoglobinopathies. This review is limited by the paucity of high-quality RCTs addressing the impact of patient education on self-management. Notably, a considerable volume of studies that employ a non-RCT design were identified and also warrant appropriate analysis. Rigorously designed trials are needed to draw clinically-relevant conclusions regarding type and effectiveness of patient education for adult hemoglobinopathy patients. REFERENCE: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Disclosures Kuo: Agios: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,051

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,027
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0150,027
Bibliométrie0,0070,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,281 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→Travaux en français237 207→