An Ongoing Global, Longitudinal, Observational Study of Patients with Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency: The PEAK Registry
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in the PKLR gene that lead to reduced red blood cell PK (PK-R) enzyme activity. This rare hereditary glycolytic enzymopathy, with over 300 causative PKLR mutations identified to date, results in defective red blood cell glycolysis and hemolytic anemia. While the clinical presentation is variable, patients with PK deficiency may experience symptoms of hemolytic anemia, most commonly fatigue (sometimes extreme), jaundice, and dyspnea. No disease-specific therapy currently exists and treatment is limited to supportive care, including red blood cell transfusions, splenectomy/cholecystectomy, and iron chelation. Affected neonates may need phototherapy or exchange transfusions for severe hyperbilirubinemia. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation may cure the disease but experience is limited and the outcome is variable. Due the rarity of PK deficiency, its prevalence, clinical burden, and long-term clinical course are not well defined. To address this gap, Boston Children's Hospital is nearing completion of the observational PK deficiency Natural History Study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02053480; N=254) to better understand the natural history and clinical burden of the disease. This longitudinal analysis (2-year follow-up) will report on PK deficiency-related signs, symptoms, and treatment outcomes. In order to continue and expand upon the collection of longitudinal data for PK deficiency, the Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Global Longitudinal Registry (the PEAK Registry; NCT03481738) was developed. This registry study is a global, longitudinal, observational study for adult and pediatric patients with PK deficiency. Its primary objective is to record the natural history, treatment, outcomes, variability in clinical manifestations, and disease burden of patients with PK deficiency. Secondary objectives include data collection to assess the prevalence, incidence, and complications associated with PK deficiency; evaluate pregnancy outcomes; and investigate possible phenotype-genotype correlations. The study also aims to provide longitudinal data to assist physicians with the clinical management of individual patients. In order to maximize the amount of longitudinal data available, a novel data management system is being employed to harmonize Natural History Study and PEAK Registry data. Approximately 500 patients will be enrolled over 7 years at an estimated 60 study centers in up to 20 countries in the 9-year study. All enrolled patients will be followed prospectively for at least 2 years and up to 9 years. Site and patient recruitment began in 2018. As of July 2019, 43 sites in 11 countries are active (Figure) and site recruitment has begun in Thailand, South Korea, and Australia. An update on patient enrollment will be provided. Disclosures Grace: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Bianchi:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Glader:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Glenthøj:Celgene: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Alexion: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Jones:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kanno:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Kuo:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy. Layton:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cerus Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. van Beers:Pfizer: Research Funding; RR Mechatronics: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Xu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».