MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2988468277 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-124553

Phase 3 Exploratory Analysis of Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes (AML-MRC) Who Received Consolidation with CPX-351 Versus Conventional Chemotherapy

2019· article· en· W2988468277 sur OpenAlexaff
Jonathan E. Kolitz, Daniel H. Ryan, Laura F. Newell, Stephen A. Strickland, Donna E. Hogge, Scott R. Solomon, Gary J. Schiller, Robert J. Ryan, Stefan Faderl, Jörge E. Cortes

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensLeukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCytarabineInternal medicineHazard ratioDaunorubicinInduction chemotherapyOncologyChemotherapy regimenPopulationLeukemiaGastroenterologySurgeryChemotherapyConfidence interval

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: AML-MRC is an AML subtype that includes patients (pts) with (1) a history of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm, (2) a MDS-related cytogenetic abnormality, or (3) multilineage dysplasia in >50% of ≥2 cell lineages in the absence of NPM1 or biallelic CEBPA mutations, per the WHO 2016 AML guidelines. Historically, pts with AML-MRC have poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy. CPX-351 (Vyxeos®; daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome for injection), a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin at a synergistic 5:1 molar ratio, is approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML or AML-MRC. This approval was based on results of a large randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study (NCT01696084) in pts aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk/secondary AML. In the overall study population, induction followed by consolidation with CPX-351 significantly improved overall survival (OS; 9.56 vs 5.95 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69; 1-sided P = 0.003) vs conventional 7+3, with a safety profile comparable to that of 7+3. An exploratory subgroup analysis of this phase 3 study was performed to compare outcomes for CPX-351 vs 7+3 in pts with AML-MRC who received consolidation. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive 1-2 induction cycles with CPX-351 (100 units/m2 [cytarabine 100 mg/m2 +daunorubicin 44 mg/m2] as a 90-minute infusion on Days 1, 3, and 5 [2nd induction: Days 1 and 3]) or 7+3 (cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day continuously for 7 days [2nd induction: 5 days] + daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 on Days 1-3 [2nd induction: Days 1-2]). Pts achieving a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery (CRi) could receive up to 2 consolidation cycles with CPX-351 (65 units/m2 [cytarabine 65 mg/m2 + daunorubicin 29 mg/m2] on Days 1 and 3) or 5+2 (as for 2nd induction). Pts could receive hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) at the discretion of the treating physician. This exploratory analysis included the subgroup of pts who met the WHO 2008 AML-MRC criteria and received consolidation. Results: The study enrolled 309 pts, all with high-risk/secondary AML, including 246 (80%; n = 123 in each arm) who were diagnosed with AML-MRC. Among the pts with AML-MRC, 39/123 (32%) in the CPX-351 arm and 25/123 (20%) in the 7+3/5+2 arm received consolidation and were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics for this subgroup were generally balanced between arms; however, the CPX-351 arm included a higher proportion of pts with de novo AML with MDS karyotype (46% vs 24%) and a lower proportion of pts with antecedent MDS (44% vs 64%). The median time from induction last dose to consolidation 1 was 50 days in the CPX-351 arm and 45 days in the 7+3/5+2 arm, and median time between consolidation cycles for those who received 2 cycles was 47 days and 41.5 days, respectively. CPX-351 and 5+2 were received in the outpatient setting by 20/39 (51%) and 1/25 (4%) pts, respectively, during consolidation 1 and 10/17 (59%) and 0/10 pts during consolidation 2. All pts with AML-MRC who received consolidation achieved CR+CRi except 1 patient in the CPX-351 arm. Median OS for pts who received consolidation was longer with CPX-351 vs 7+3/5+2 (25.43 vs 9.95 months; HR = 0.50 [95% CI: 0.27-0.93]; Figure 1). More AML-MRC pts underwent HCT after CPX-351 vs 5+2 consolidation (49% vs 32%; unadjusted relative risk = 1.52 [95% CI: 0.79-2.93]), and OS landmarked from the HCT date was longer with CPX-351 (not reached vs 4.98 months; HR = 0.36 [95% CI: 0.12-1.07]; Figure 2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in pts with AML-MRC who received consolidation were febrile neutropenia (CPX-351: 82%; 7+3/5+2: 76%), constipation (62%; 64%), peripheral edema (62%; 64%), nausea (62%; 56%), fatigue (51%; 56%), and diarrhea (49%; 80%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were febrile neutropenia (CPX-351: 82%; 7+3/5+2: 76%) and pneumonia (13%; 20%). The most common serious TEAE was febrile neutropenia (13%; 20%). One (3%) pt in the CPX-351 arm and 3 (12%) pts in the 7+3/5+2 arm experienced a TEAE resulting in death. Conclusions: Continued therapy with CPX-351 throughout induction and consolidation improved median OS, HCT rates, and OS landmarked from the HCT date vs 7+3/5+2 chemotherapy among pts with AML-MRC. The safety profile of CPX-351 in these pts was also consistent with the known safety profile of 7+3/5+2. Disclosures Kolitz: Boeringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Ryan:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; University of Rochester: Patents & Royalties. Strickland:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. Schiller:Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Ryan:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Faderl:Jazz Pharmaceutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cortes:Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→