MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2988792442 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-124587

Correlation of CD123 Expression Level with Disease Characteristics and Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group

2019· article· en· W2988792442 sur OpenAlexaff
Adam J. Lamble, Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen, Todd A. Alonzo, Jim J. Wang, Robert B. Gerbing, Laura Pardo, Lillian Sung, Sarah K. Tasian, E. Anders Kolb, Richard Aplenc, Michael R. Loken, Soheil Meshinchi

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineOncologyInterleukin-3 receptorInternal medicineMinimal residual diseaseInduction chemotherapyMyeloid leukemiaHematologyHematopoietic stem cell transplantationTransplantationChemotherapyChemotherapy regimenHazard ratioPopulationLeukemiaSorafenibImmunologyConfidence interval

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Despite maximally intensified chemotherapy, cure rates remain suboptimal for children and young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). As CD123 (IL3RA) is expressed on the majority of AML cells, it is a promising immunotherapeutic target. Increased CD123 expression has been linked to high-risk disease characteristics in adult AML, but clinical implications for childhood AML are less well-defined. Methods: The Children's Oncology Group AAML1031 phase 3 trial (NCT01371981) tested the efficacy of the addition of bortezomib to standard chemotherapy in a randomized fashion. A total of 1400 children and young adults were enrolled on study. All diagnostic specimens were centrally and prospectively evaluated for the expression of CD123 by multi-dimensional flow cytometry (MDF) at Hematologics, Inc. Patients were stratified to either a low-risk (LR) or high-risk (HR) arm of the therapy based on cytogenetic and molecular alterations and end-of-induction (EOI) minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by MDF. LR patients received four cycles of chemotherapy, while HR patients received 3 courses of chemotherapy followed by best allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients with high allelic ratio FLT3-ITD enrolled on arm C received sorafenib in combination with standard chemotherapy followed by HSCT. Here we provide data on expression of CD123 across all patients and correlate this expression with disease characteristics and clinical outcomes. Results: Surface CD123 expression on AML cells was available for 1040 patients, and expression level varied significantly across the study population with a median CD123 molecules per cell of 1300 (range 120-13,100 molecules per cell). For analysis, the study population was divided into quartiles (n=260 each) based on CD123 expression levels. Significant variation in cytogenetic/molecular characteristics was observed across the four quartiles, where those with highest CD123 expression had a lower prevalence of t(8;21), inv(16), and CEBPA mutations (p<0.001 for all) and higher prevalence of KMT2A rearrangements and FLT3-ITD mutations (p<0.001 for both) (Figure 1A). CD123 expression quartile was not significantly different among those in morphological complete remission (CR) (p=0.278) or MRD negative (bone marrow < 0.1%) (p=0.182) at EOI. Evaluation of outcome parameters across the four quartiles demonstrated that those in lower CD123 expression quartiles 1, 2 and 3 (Q1-3) had similar relapse risk (RR), event-free and overall survival (EFS and OS). However, those with the highest CD123 expression (Q4) had a significantly higher RR (53% vs. 39%, p<0.001), lower EFS (49% vs. 69%, p<0.001), and lower OS (32% vs 50%, p<0.001) (Figure 1B) in comparison to Q1-3. These differences were maintained within the protocol-defined LR cohort, as those with LR disease but high CD123 expression (Q4) had worse RR, EFS, and OS versus those in Q1-3 (p<0.001 for all) (Figure 1C). Given the observed association of CD123 expression with known risk groups, we performed a multivariable Cox regression analysis of all prognostic factors, including cytogenetic/molecular risk group, age, MRD status, and FLT3-ITD status, which demonstrated that high CD123 expression was independently associated with worse OS (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21-1.96, p<0.001) (Figure 1D). Conclusions: CD123 expression is strongly associated with disease-relevant cytogenetic and molecular alterations in childhood AML. Patients with highest CD123 surface expression are more likely to have HR genetic alterations and a paucity of LR features. Further, despite similar induction remission rates, those with high CD123 expression had inferior clinical outcomes compared to patients with lower CD123 expression. However, despite an association with HR features, expression of CD123 appears to be independently associated with therapeutic response given that outcome differences were maintained in multivariate regression analysis. This suggests that CD123 expression may provide additional prognostic information, as highlighted by the inferior outcomes in LR patients that had high CD123 expression. In pediatric and young adult patients with the highest risk disease, the higher CD123 expression represents a valuable therapeutic target in the development of immunotherapies for childhood AML. Disclosures Eidenschink Brodersen: Hematologics, Inc: Employment. Pardo:Hematologics, Inc: Employment. Tasian:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Aleta Biotherapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corportation: Research Funding. Loken:Hematologics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207