MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2989357665 · doi:10.7939/r3-9pfj-ef44

The influence of soil reconstruction materials and targeted fertilization on the regeneration dynamics in boreal upland forest reclamation

2019· article· en· W2989357665 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shauna Stack

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueSeedling growth and survival studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLand reclamationBorealHuman fertilizationRegeneration (biology)TaigaEnvironmental scienceAgroforestryForestryGeographyEcologyAgronomyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Soil is an essential component supporting the growth and maintenance of terrestrial ecosystems such as forests, providing anchorage, water, and nutrients. In Canada’s boreal forest landscape, surface soils can differ widely in their chemical and physical conditions, ranging from coarse to fine textured mineral soils in the uplands to organic soils in the lowlands. Industrial disturbances in the boreal region require the salvage of surface- and sub-soils from low- and upland areas during open pit mine operations that are used in the reconstruction of soil profiles for forest reclamation. These materials are selectively salvaged and can be arranged in variable layers and thicknesses, which could have profound effects on early forest establishment. For the first project of my thesis, I compared the growth of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.), and white spruce (Picea glauca Moench.) on different reconstructed soil profiles using varying surface soil materials (salvaged lowland peat and upland forest floor material (FFM)), placement depths (10 or 30cm for peat, 10 or 20cm for FFM), and subsoil material types determined by salvage depth (Bm, BC, and C). Early seedling establishment and growth as well as soil and climatic parameters were monitored over a five-year period. Seedling growth was greatest on FFM and appeared to be related to phosphorous availability, while peat as a surface soil reduced growth, likely due to delayed soil warming in the spring and overall cooler soil conditions that potentially limited resource availability. However, the greater water holding capacity of the organic matter in peat provided a benefit for seedling growth that was apparent during water limiting climatic conditions. The underlying subsoil material influenced growth later in establishment when roots occupied the deeper subsoils. Aspen growth was greatest when the subsoil was shallow salvaged and represented a weathered subsoil (Bm) compared to the more deeply salvaged, less weathered subsoils BC and C. Aspen and pine seedlings, with their larger roots systems, may have benefited from small increases in the silt fraction of the subsoils that increased the water holding capacity of these otherwise coarse textured sandy soils. Spruce regeneration responded marginally to soil treatments because of its overall slow growth-strategy and tolerance to resource limitations. Based on the initial 5-year study, seedlings may have been limited by low phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) availability in the peat and the homogenized subsoil materials, while nitrogen (N) was readily available in the peat coversoil. Broadcast fertilization is a common method used to treat nutrient limitations on reclamation sites, supplying a wide range of nutrients to fulfill the varying requirements that are unique to each tree species; however, operational applications of NPK on organic soils often induce strong responses from unwanted colonizing vegetation, which reduces the nutritional benefits intended for the seedlings and could render the fertilizer application ineffective. A follow-up study was developed to test the use of a broadcast fertilizer application that targets specific nutrient deficiencies in the soil and in each tree species, while simultaneously reducing the response of competing vegetation. Liquid fertilizer was applied to six-year-old seedlings using five treatments in the field: Control (no fertilizer), NPK, PK, P, and K. Seedling growth, foliar nutrients, and vegetation cover as well as environmental parameters were measured over two growing seasons. Aspen responded the strongest to fertilization, particularly in the P treatment, while pine and spruce marginally responded to the NPK treatment; however, growth responses depended on the type of subsoil treatment. All three species had foliar P concentrations below their optimal levels in the Controls, while foliar N concentrations were low for both conifers. The competing vegetation increased in NPK and did not respond to the P, K and the Control treatments, indicating targeted fertilization reduced responses from colonizing competitors. Additional analyses of the soil conditions (e.g. pH, cation sorption, water availability, temperature) suggest that other factors were more limiting to the trees during the study, which reduced their responses to the fertilizer additions. Results from this thesis demonstrate how different strategies used for soil reconstruction and targeted fertilization can affect the performance of forest regeneration in post-mine areas, and boreal forest species responses may vary according to their ecological adaptations and the site conditions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,518

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,146
Écart entre enseignants0,142 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetSeedling growth and survival studiesTravaux en français237 207