Castle Construction, Conquest and Compensation ( <i>The Christine Mahany Memorial Lecture</i> )
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For older members of the Battle Conference the most abiding memory of Christine Mahany (15 January 1939–13 July 2016) (Fig. 1) will almost certainly be of her sitting at the bar in The Chequers, pint in hand, deep in conversation with Allen Brown, while George, her beloved labrador, patiently languished at her feet. Dogs were a frequent subject of passionate discussion. It was, after all, a time when canine delegates Matilda and Offa were cast in the crucial role of celebrity judges who voiced their opinion of tendentious arguments and windy papers with a yawn or a howl. As often as not, though, the chat was about archaeology or history, or, more precisely, archaeology and history. As odd as it may seem today, the relationship between the two subjects was something of an issue in the 1970s and 1980s. Archaeology as the handmaiden to history was still a cheap put-down that was bandied about in historical circles. Chris came to Battle as an advocate of equality and common interest. After something of a false start, her background was copper-bottomed archaeology. She studied zoology as a student but spent much of her time in Leicester's New Walk Museum sorting pottery sherds and the like, and so after graduation she was drawn to archaeology as a career. She cut her teeth under the tutelage of Philip Rahtz, the great exponent of open-area excavation, digging on seminal early medieval sites such as Cheddar and Cannington. Thereafter she became an itinerant archaeologist for the Ministry of Public Buildings and Works in her own right, supervising a wide range of sites. Her excavation of the small Roman town of Alcester in Warwickshire was a particular achievement. Temperamentally, however, her interests had always gravitated towards medieval archaeology, and her appointment as director of the Stamford Archaeological Research Committee in 1966 gave her the opportunity to indulge them. She was to stay in Stamford for the rest of her career. Her appointment came at an opportune time. After a decade of inappropriate post-war development – vandalism is probably a more appropriate term – the historic core of Stamford was designated as the first conservation area in Britain. Chris's brief was to recover its archaeology and produce a coherent account of its origins and growth. Twenty or so excavations and numerous watching briefs followed, covering the full range of medieval life.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,131 | 0,032 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».