MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2989854864

Accounting Changes in the Public Sector in Estonia/Apskaitos Pokyciai Estijos Viesajame Sektoriuje

2010· article· lt· W2989854864 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juta Tikk

Notice bibliographique

RevueVerslas teorija ir praktika · 2010
Typearticle
Languelt
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAccounting and Organizational Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAccountingNational accountsAccounting standardMark-to-market accountingAccounting information systemFinancial accountingTransparency (behavior)AccrualFund accountingInternational Financial Reporting StandardsOrder (exchange)Public sectorBusinessEconomicsEconomyPolitical scienceFinanceEarningsLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

1. Introduction Over the last decades, much time and effort is being spent to move from cameralistic accounting towards accrual accounting in order to increase transparency of the public accounting data. This movement can be considered as a part of an almot world-wide public sector reform. Estonia is no exception to the rule. During the recent dramatic changes in business environment, Estonia has successfully passed a financial and a management reform. The transition to market economy started in Estonia similarly to other Central and Eastern European countries in the late 1980ies. The legal reform in accounting that took place at the same time required the preparation and implementation of new legal acts, which would lay foundations for the accounting system characteristic of a market economy. The first step here was the Regulation of Accounting, which laid foundations for the implementation of financial accounting in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards under the conditions of market economy (Jarve 2006). A further development was the Accounting Act that came into force on January 1, 1995. The Act was prepared by the members of the Estonian Accounting Standards Board; three members out of seven were expatriate Estonians who had international working experience in Sweden, Canada and Great Britain. The contribution of the specialists having international experience in market economies was crucial in order to prevent several mistakes and problems (Haldma 2006). The Accounting Act, which was really progressive at that time, had its drawback in the determination of the framework that could be implemented in the public sector only to a limited extent. Although the generally accepted accounting principles and concepts apply both to the business and public sector, financial accounting and its administration are characterized by certain peculiarities due to the different, and in some aspects also contradictory, purposes of business entities and public sector entities, which had not been fully taken into account by the act. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the implementation of the accrual accounting in the entities of the Estonian public sector. In that connection a brief overview of the historical development of governmental accounting theories and examination of the introduction of theorybased accounting policy are given. Main problems and risks in the accounting system change process have brought up and solutions offered. This study attempts to answer the following research question: how to gain full benefit from accounting information in public sector entities. The paper is organised into three sections. The first section introduces the historical development of the different accounting systems for public sector and sets a theoretical framework for the public sector reforms. The following section gives an overview of the modernisation of Estonian financial accounting and reporting process for public sector. The next section identifies the major problems to be paid attention. Finally the concluding remarks are presented. 2. Theoretical framework 2.1. The historical development of the government accounting systems While taking a closer look into the historical development of the government accounting systems one can distinguish between two opinions (Sevim et al. 2008: 2466): 1. Classical Government Accounting 2. Modern Government Accounting The classical opinion can be viewed as Cameral and Schneider Accounting Systems, and the modern opinion can be separated into Constante and Logismography Accounting Systems. According to Monsen (2008), cameral accounting was developed as early as the 16th century onwards in order to contribute to increased control of public money. It was applied in Austria in 1768 for the first time. Most of the literature dealing with cameral accounting is published in German, and it seems to be known only to a small extent beyond the German speaking countries. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,722
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVerslas teorija ir praktikaMême sujetAccounting and Organizational ManagementTravaux en français237 207