123 Nerve growth factor-induced ovulation in llamas: Evidence of hypothalamic refractoriness to nerve growth factor during the declining phase of the luteinising hormone surge
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Nerve growth factor (NGF) in semen is responsible for triggering ovulation after copulation in camelids. Interaction of NGF with its cognate receptors results in a preovulatory luteinising hormone (LH) surge that leads to ovulation, but the pharmacokinetics of NGF and the mechanism by which it mediates LH release are unknown. In an effort to elucidate the site and mechanism of action involved, the objective of this study was to determine whether the decline in the LH surge occurs as a result of pituitary depletion (i.e. diminished response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)) or as an obtunded response at the level of the hypothalamus (diminished GnRH). Adult nonpregnant, nonlactating llamas (n = 18) were synchronized by the administration of an ovulatory dose of a GnRH analogue (100 μg IM; Fertiline, Vetoquinol). At 10 to 14 days later, the ovaries were examined to confirm the presence of a dominant follicle measuring ≥ 7 mm, and a jugular catheter was put in place. The following day, a pretreatment blood sample was taken, and llamas were treated intravenously with 1 mg of purified NGF from llama seminal plasma. Blood samples were taken every 30 min for 7 h from the time of NGF treatment. After the last blood sample was taken, llamas were treated with NGF (n = 6; 1 mg IV), GnRH (n = 5; 100 μg IV), or saline (Sal; IV; n = 6), and blood samples were taken every 30 min for another 7 h. The ovaries were examined 48 h after initial NGF treatment, via transrectal ultrasonography, to detect ovulation. Plasma was harvested and stored for analysis of LH concentration by radioimmunoassay. Data were compared using ANOVA for repeated measures, and single-point data were analysed using paired t-tests. As expected, most llamas ovulated in response to the initial NGF treatment (5 out of 5 in NGF-GnRH; 5 of 6 in NGF-NGF; 5 of 6 in NGF-Sal). Compared with pretreatment values, all llamas showed a 4-fold increase in plasma LH concentrations within 2 h of the initial NGF treatment (P < 0.05). Plasma LH concentrations peaked at 3 h after initial NGF treatment and began to decline 4.5 to 5 h after treatment (P < 0.05). Plasma LH concentrations continued to decline following the second dose of NGF or Sal, whereas a transient elevation of LH was detected in llamas treated with GnRH (P < 0.05). The LH concentration returned to basal levels (pretreatment) 8, 12, and 13 h after NGF treatment in llamas treated with NGF-Sal, NGF-GnRH, and NGF-NGF, respectively. We conclude that the lack of LH response to the second dose of NGF is not because of pituitary depletion but rather due to diminished GnRH. The latter may be attributed to either a downregulation of NGF receptors within the hypothalamus or to temporary depletion of GnRH at the nerve terminals within the median eminence. Research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».