The Trilateral MBA: An Approach to International Exchange of Students
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
CASE DESCRIPTION The primary subject matter of this case is the development and implementation of a joint graduate program involving schools from multiple countries. Secondary issues examined include funding, business models, and evaluation of joint international programs. An innovative MBA program involving students and universities from three North American countries is presented. Other issues include the adapting of curriculum and using funding sources for these types of programs. Students reading the case are faced with a critical decision at the end of the case including whether the joint international program can continue and in what format. The case has a difficulty level of five, appropriate for first year graduate level or above. The case is designed to be taught in one hour following appropriate introduction of the key issues involved. The case is expected to involve one hour of student preparation. CASE SYNOPSIS The face of internationalization of universities is changing. Students are opting for more programs where they earn a degree at an international institution. Universities are adopting new and innovative programs to retain high achieving students who have the ambition and drive to study outside of the U.S. While universities understand the importance of increasing the internationalization of their students, they also understand the importance of doing so at a cost neutral or relatively low cost method. This case examines the experiences of a U.S. institution, a Canadian institution, and a Mexican institution as they design and implement a joint program using the twinning approach. It examines some of the internal and external challenges that arise in internationalization efforts today. While this case centers on the experiences involving an MBA program, the issues involved are easily adapted to other international and/or joint programs. This case can be centered on many different facets--curricular design, financing, development and balance of exchange programs, benefits and costs to students and a university of exporting and importing students, the role of grants in internationalization efforts, student recruiting, and selecting the appropriate exchange model. INTRODUCTION Higher education professionals are constantly looking for ways to improve the learning opportunities for students. One objective, especially in business education, is to provide additional opportunities for global learning. This can be done in numerous ways, including short term study abroad opportunities, semester long exchange opportunities, recruiting international students to be integrated into the domestic classrooms, and modification of the curriculum to include more global issues. When dealing with graduate management education, the opportunities are more limited than with undergraduate programs, primarily due to the shorter time frame for these programs. In addition, students in the US are much less likely than students from other countries to take part international study programs. As leaders of graduate programs in higher education, you are faced with the task of providing international education for your students while maintaining budget and curricular priorities. This exercise presents a relatively novel way of providing the opportunity, especially for US students, by developing a three-country cohort program for an MBA. In 2002 you and the program directors from several schools from Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. met to discuss ways to expand the international efforts of their schools. The goals were to expand student opportunities for postgraduate education, strengthen their ties at the undergraduate level, expose their students to different cultures, increase language training and proficiency, and expand collaboration between the members of the faculty at their institutions. Since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was born only eight years before to lessen the economic barriers between these three countries it seemed natural for Mexico, Canada, and the U. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».