MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2991966591 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v22i2.974

The arts and social justice: re-crafting adult education and community cultural leadership Darlene E. Clover and Joyce Stalker (Eds.). National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE), Leicester, UK, 2007, 188 pages.

2010· article· en· W2991966591 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Katherine McManus

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAdult and Continuing Education Topics
Établissements canadiensSimon Fraser University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSocial justiceSociologyThe artsMedia studiesEconomic JusticeVisual artsArtPolitical scienceSocial scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

professor at the University of Alberta, has written about her long-term research connection with women anti-dictatorship activists living in Arica, Chile, the country's most northern coastal city.Early in the book, Chovanec offers a succinct summary of Chile's long history of oppression, also pointing to the equally significant history of resistance and dissent through labour, women's, and indigenous movements.Through interviews, she explores (with depth and great detail) the retrospective reflections of the women of Arica about the past and their contributions to the battle for freedom that took place after the overthrow of Allende's socialist government in 1973, which was followed by a brutal repressive military dictatorship led by General Augusto Pinochet.Thousands were assassinated and exiled.Chovanec reminds us that Pinochet's repressive regime was part of a long-standing process of colonization, which has left its mark throughout Latin America.Forced underground by the military dictatorship, many Chilean citizens lived in fear until the early 1980s, when protests began to reemerge with women at the forefront.This book tells the story of their courage, tactics, and strategies, as well as the long-term impact on these women of their engagement.The book makes a significant contribution to the scholarship of learning in social movements, an important area of inquiry in the field of adult education.The book is divided into two parts.In Part One, Chovanec focuses on the data, organizing her analysis into four sections, or acts, while in Part Two, she considers the case in light of current theorizing about social movement learning.In the first act (Los Antecendentes) of Part One, Chovanec maps the background and the family and social contexts that influenced the women's activism.Readers will be drawn into the geography of Arica as Chovanec provides a thick description of the setting, giving us a sense of the geography, street scenes, houses, markets, and businesses of the city.We learn how family and, in particular, the democratic and socialist orientations of many in this northern city were significant spheres of learning for these women.Municipal politics, richly informed by leftist approaches, also influenced their activism.The second act (La Lucha, or the struggle) outlines the different activities and women's experiences during the anti-dictatorship movement, beginning with the first meeting in 1983 and ending in 1990 when the dictatorship was finally overthrown.We learn there were two women's organizations: MODEMU and CEDEMU.The first was the largest group and oriented to leftist politics, while the second was smaller and more explicitly feminist.At times their activities came together, and in 1984 efforts were made to create a new organization, Women for Democracy, which folded after three years.Along with very public activities such as protests and disruptions of meetings, underground strategies such as creating and distributing anti-dictatorship materials, spray-painting, and bomb-making took place.Many communal survival efforts, such as collective kitchens, were also initiated and were

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,422
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,341
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult EducationMême sujetAdult and Continuing Education TopicsTravaux en français237 207