Creating and Fostering Sustainable Intrapreneurship: A Conversation with David Gutierrez
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Executive SummaryCapitalism was described by the renowned economist Joseph A. Schumpeter as a process of Creative Destruction (Schumpeter, 1942/2008: 83). Entrepreneurs who foster innovation were seen by him as a key element involved in creating new products and while at the same time destroying old products and services. However, Schumpeter suggested that by destroying entrepreneurism, capitalism would eventually self-destruct. This will happen as businesses get larger and tend to give less value to internally generated innovation - entrepreneurs will lose incentive to innovate as they become smothered in bureaucratic organizations. Bureau and committee work [will] tend to replace individual action. Rationalized and specialized office work will eventually blot out personality [and individual] ...vision (Schumpeter, 1942/2008: 133).Fortunately, Schumpeter's prediction regarding the death of entrepreneurship has not come to pass. Most large corporations have not only accepted the strategic importance of continual innovation but have also recognized that the fostering of individual vision is critical to this important internal process. From the corporate perspective, it is literally change or die - merely maintaining the status quo is not an option. All businesses must continue to innovate in order to remain competitive, and often this means diversifying into new areas, as well as upgrading existing products and services (Kanter, Ingols, Morgan & Seggerman, 1986:14). Therefore, the current question is how can large business organizations recognize and encourage entrepreneurs within the corporate hierarchy? Because the term entrepreneurship is often associated with innovative start-up businesses, the term intrapreneurship is here used to describe innovation and the entrepreneurial spirit as exercised within the large corporate environment. For intrapreneurship to thrive in today's global business environment, the strategic importance of creative thinking and acting must be effectively communicated and fostered at all levels of the organization.In the following interview, David Gutierrez shares his thoughts on the need for sustainable intrapreneurship. Gutierrez is the chief information officer for the Solutions Technology Partners Department at Assurant Solutions, an international provider of specialty insurance and financial products based in Atlanta, Georgia. Gutierrez has been involved in the field of information technology for more than 30 years. He is a businessman who is committed to using technology as a tool for supporting innovation and to seeking new and improved ways of doing business. Gutierrez fully believes that the entrepreneurial spirit is alive and well inside large corporations.The international arena is very familiar to Gutierrez. He was bora in Bogota, Colombia and worked with Young & Rubicam, Inc. where he was Systems Director for the southern hemisphere responsible for 32 countries. He then worked at Aetna International Inc., where he covered 15 countries in Latin America and Asia Pacific. Subsequently, at ING Insurance Americas, he was responsible for information systems implementations in six countries. In his current position he oversees Assurant Solutions' information technology needs in the US, Canada, Europe, China and Latin America: a total of 13 countries.Among his many awards and honors, Gutierrez received the 2005 CIO 100 Award for Boldness and Innovative Solutions sponsored by CIO Magazine. He was also named CIO of the Year in 2006 by the Latinos in Information Science and Technology Association. This award was given in recognition of his dedication to the community and to the development of IT among Latinos both within and outside the United States.Authors: In Corporate Venturing: Creating New Businesses Within the Firm, Zenas Block and Ian M acMillan indicated that corporate entrepreneurship initiatives are very risky and have a high failure rate. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,014 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,015 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».