Intersubjectivity: The Best Congenial Stock to Link the Western Thoughts with the Chinese Culture/INTERACTIVETE DE SUJET, CENTRE DE LA COMBINATION DES CULTURES ORIENTALES ET OCCIDENTALES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract: The theory of intersubjectivity is the development of the Western ideologies in modern times. It derives from subjectivity and it is the transcendence over subjectivity. Rather than as a theory of philosophy or aesthetics, it had been a concept and methodology infiltrating through the Chinese aesthetic practices, social concepts and culture. This thesis probes into the possibility of combining the Chinese culture and the Western thoughts by analyzing intersubjectivity embodied in the Chinese philosophy, social and political thoughts and the Chinese literary and art thoughts, thereby, proving that intersubjectivity is the best congenial stock to link the Western thoughts with the Chinese culture. Keywords: Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity, Epistemology, the Moral Philosophy Resume: Theorie d'interactivite de sujet, le developpement modern des idees de theorie d'interactivite de sujet, prend sa source dans la nature de sujet et la passe. En Chine, l'interactivite de sujet ne se pose pas comme une theorie dans les domaines de philosophie ou esthetique, mais elle s'est infiltree dans les idees sociales et esthetiques chinoises. Cet article se presente l'interactivite a travers des idees de philosophique, societe, politique et litterature chinoise, et il se presente la possibilite de la combinassions et la point de depart -interactivite de sujet. Mots-cles: Subjectivite, intersubjectivite, epistemologie, la philosophie morale 1. INTRODUCTION As Chinese culture has come into thorongh contact with the Western thought systems of the world, the two completely different ideological systems inevitably collide. During the processes of contact, it would sumly be a great loss to mankind at large if the acceptance of this new civilization should take the form of abrupt displacement instead of organic assimilation, thereby causing the disappearance of the Chinese traditional civilization. The real problem, therefore, may be restated thus: How can we best assimilate modem civilization in such a manner as to make it congemal and congruous and continuous with the civilization of our own makinS? How can we combine the two thought systems organically? What counts is to find a congenial stock with which we may organically link the thought systems of modern Europe and America, so that we may further build up our own ideological system on the new foundation of an internal assimilation of the Western thoughts. Intersubjectivity is the best congenial stock to link the Western thoughts with the Chinese culture. There is a generally accepted idea that the Chinese culture and ideologies and the Western thought systems seem to be two parallel theories that will never meet together. As a result of it, the Chinese scholars have always ignored the Chinese traditional thoughts resources while introducing the Western ideologies. But in fact the most important contributions of modern ideologies in the Western world can all find their remote but highly developed precursors in those great Chinese schools of the fifth, fourth, and third centuries B.C. Intersubjectivity is a best case in point. Intersubjectivity derives from subjectivity and it is the transcendence over subjectivity. Husserl firstly put forward intersubjectivity, followed by Heidegger, Sartre, Martin Buber and etc. They elaborated their views on intersubjectivity from different angles in succession. In a word, intersubjectivity holds a leading position in the modern Western ideological theories. Although the theory of intersubjectivity is the development of the Western ideologies in modern times, the Chinese aesthetics and social concepts were originally intersubjective. However, in China there has never formed a perfect organic ideological system like that of the Western world. Rather than as a theory of philosophy or aesthetics, it had been a concept and methodology embodied in the aesthetic practice and social concepts and culture. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,029 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».