Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all! It is by attention to this point that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose. Sun Tzu. Over the past two decades, Mexico has joined the globalization process having signed several trade agreements and confronting free market competition, at the same time Mexican authorities have improved regulation and expanded transparency requirements of the financial market and banking sectors in accordance with the trend toward globalization and in line with its continental counterparts, the United States and Canada. Mexican companies have advance in three major areas in order to compete efficiently against multinational companies offering new imported products: improving corporate governance practices, increasing transparency, and complying with new financial information standards. This new business milieu raises the questions as to whether or not globalization and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) have affected the financial performance of the Mexican corporate firm or its capital structure requirements. Has it impacted Mexico's commercial environment in a positive or negative way? Local companies have responded to this new environment by adopting new ways of approaching their customers, developing new strategies of competing against their challengers, and spurring the creation of new products. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) from USA and Canada into Mexican economy has completely transformed its commercial landscape and greatly influenced the way the local companies introduces new products, new services, sought out new markets and/or explored associations with its new competitors. But, not all strategies worked as successfully as expected. We sought answers to the question: which strategies adopted by Mexican publicly traded companies were linked to financial success and which strategies unsuccessful? In exploring this question, we took into account that any new strategy had to have required the accommodation of the company's actual resources (i.e. their change in assets and liabilities), sought to understand whether any strategy impacted the company either positively or negatively, and analyzed the financial performance of a company over several fiscal periods. This permitted us to deduce how and what strategies were successful and identify how and where those resources were utilized by the company's management. Under the emerging market context, we asked what kinds of strategies were successful and did the type of capital structure utilized by the company relate to their success or failure. Overall, the purpose of this paper is to explore the Mexican public company at two levels, first explored whether there was any financial improvement before and after the NAFTA and the globalization process at Mexican Stock Exchange (MSE), overall system analysis. The second level is at company or case level, we investigated several firms with either outstanding financial success or poor financial performance looking into whether there were associations between financial performance and the implementation of a descriptive strategy used by the various firms during the relevant time frame. Then, at the MSE level we examined whether the developments of NAFTA and increased globalization affected specific industrial sectors o firm performance, and whether it has impacted the capital structure of various Mexican industrial sectors and the Mexican firm. We selected various types of companies looking for a relationship between financial performance and strategy. What kinds of strategies were adopted by different firms? Is there any relationship between management strategy, capital structure or ownership structure? …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».