MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2993651039 · doi:10.18357/big_r71202522738

Letter of Introduction

2019· article· en· W2993651039 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emmanuel Brunet‐Jailly

Notice bibliographique

RevueBorders in Globalization Review · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLegal case studies and regulations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Readers, Our much-anticipated 7.1 issue of Borders in Globalization Review is here, with new research into European border narratives, artwork on the historical displacement of the Sámi people, and more! As always, our content is free, published open access, with print editions available and distributed at cost by the University of Victoria’s Bookstore. BIG_Review is produced on the unceded Indigenous lands of the Lekwungen and W̱SÁNEĆ Peoples and we are very grateful to live and play on these beautiful lands. Leading the issue is the Special Section “Narrating Europe From the Borders”, guest edited by Birte Wassenberg and Pierrick Bruyas, with a substantial introduction and four research articles by the editors plus Katja Sarmiento-Mirwaldt, Sara Svensson and Oriana Miraka, Pierrick Bruyas, and Peter Balogh. The collection emerges from a Jean Monnet Program funded project, En Movement: quels modèles pour l’union européennes (FRONTEM). Their research examines cross-border life inside the Union through the lens of cross-border integration and management as narrated in local and regional media. Collectively, they retrace and analyse discourses, perceptions, and attitudes towards European integration since the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on Germany, Hungary and Slovakia, and across the Franco–German and Swedish–Danish borderlands. We learn that while states relied on state-of-emergency legislation and closed their borders, border regions had to manage life in borderlands and across borders despite national policy decisions. The core FRONTEM claim is that border regions and their multiple managerial responses to governance challenges shed light on European integration. Indeed, the assumption that COVID-19 stalled integration remains salient in borderlands. This issue also features three policy papers: a report on the role of interparliamentary institutions in cross-border assessments, an essay on the 40th anniversary of the Schengen Agreement and the future of the European Union, and a report on the Italy–Albania agreement externalizing EU asylum processes. As always, the Editor in Chief’s Choice Portfolio is published at the centre of BIG_Review. In Borders, Sámi artist Lena Stenberg shares work first exhibited at the Nordic House of the Faroe Islands (2023) and then in Norway at the Sámi Center for Sámi Dáiddaguovddáš in Kárášjohka /Karasjok (2023). Through sculpture, print, and photography, Stenberg documents the experience of her Sámi ancestors as they were forced to relocate at the time of the creation of the international boundaries across the Nordic States (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden) and the Sámi experiences of displacement. For Kristin Nielsen (2025, 1–13), Stenberg powerfully expresses the “fugitive aesthetics” of resistance to settler colonialism. Sámi political science professor Rauna Kuokkanen characterises settler colonial practices as Indigenous erasure by institutionalized assimilation and annexation of land and resources (2020, 512). Our Art & Borders section begins with a creative commentary by Maidie Hilmo on the ongoing resonance of artwork depicting historical standoffs and massacres at Wounded Knee, in South Dakota, USA. Then, Section Editor Elisa Ganivet brings us an interview with Judith Depaule, cofounder of the Workshop For Artists in Exile, which has supported refugee artists in France since 2017. Poetry Editor Natasha Sardzoska presents border poems by British poet Adam Horowitz and by Marija Dejanovic who was born in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In our new section, Dispatches, we share a letter to the border studies community written by Nicodème Emerusabe, who was forced to live in Manila International Airport for over a year while seeking asylum for himself and his family. The issue also offers a Film Review, “Dunki: Immigrating No Matter the Cost”, by Dev Pandya, and a Book Review, “Pending Lives”, by Parushi Ruhil Angra, both exploring themes of migration in South Asia. BIG_Review is made possible by Caitlin Janzen, Michael Carpenter, and our team of wonderful editors, board members, blind reviewers, and all the other colleagues who contribute the labour of reviewing and producing the work. We are also immensely grateful to our expert copyeditor Michelle Braiden and outstanding designer, Arifin Graham of AlarisDesign. We are also grateful to the Centre for Global Studies and University Libraries at the University of Victoria for hosting and supporting BIG_Lab. BIG_Review would not be published without the support of the European Erasmus+ funding programs. And, thanks to the support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council’s Aid to Scholarly Publications program, BIG_Review is now a Diamond open-access publication, meaning both reading and publishing in BIG_Review will be free after June 2026. The recent funding and exponential growth of online views and downloads demonstrate the demand for more and diverse knowledge about global borders. Please continue reading, sharing, and contributing to all of our open-access content. Your support is invaluable! Sincerely, Emmanuel Brunet-Jailly, Editor Kuokkanen, Rauna. 2020. “The Deatnu Agreement: A Contemporary Wall of Settler Colonialism” Settler Colonial Studies 10(4): 508–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2020.1794211 Nielsen, K. 2025. “Fugitive Aesthetics in Sámi Artist Lena Stenberg’s Exhibition Borders (2023) and Paulina Feodoroff’s Performance Matriachy (2022)” Critical Arts. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2024.2430475

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,548
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,663

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBorders in Globalization ReviewMême sujetLegal case studies and regulationsTravaux en français237 207