P069 Correlation Between Histologic Indices and Ulcerative Colitis Activity Measures Among Patients in the HICKORY (Etrolizumab) Open-Label Induction Cohort
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies in ulcerative colitis (UC) have shown at best a moderate association between histologic and clinical measures of disease activity, but few longitudinal studies have evaluated this relationship. As endoscopy and histology are both independent predictors of clinical outcomes in UC, there remains a need to assess these measures in parallel to demonstrate clinical benefit. HICKORY (NCT02100696) is an ongoing Phase 3 study evaluating etrolizumab in anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF)–experienced patients with moderate-to-severe UC. The correlation between histologic changes and established disease activity measures at end of induction (week 14) was assessed using data from the open-label induction (OLI) cohort of HICKORY. METHODS: Study analysis is based on data from patients in the OLI cohort who received ≥1 dose of etrolizumab 105 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 14-week induction phase. Baseline and week 14 biopsies were scored by 1 of 4 central readers using the Nancy histologic index (NHI) and the Robarts histopathology index (RHI) in patients who had active baseline histology (NHI >1 and RHI >3) and complete scoring at week 14 (n = 97). Binary week 14 histologic outcomes were characterized by presence or absence of neutrophils (NHI ≤1 or RHI ≤3 and Geboes subgrades 2B.0/3.0). Mayo Clinic score (MCS) endoscopic subscore (ES) was used to assess endoscopy. Pairwise associations were quantified by Spearman correlation (ρ; for correlation between change from baseline scores) and Cohen kappa coefficients (κ; for agreement among week 14 outcomes). ΔNHI and ΔRHI were compared to determine presence of a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in MCS (∆MCS ≥3 from baseline). RESULTS: At week 14, 22% (21/97), 23% (22/97), and 8% (8/97) of patients achieved resolution of neutrophilic inflammation based on either NHI or RHI/Geboes, endoscopic improvement (ES ≤ 1), and endoscopic remission (ES = 0), respectively. Among patients with endoscopic improvement and endoscopic remission, neutrophilic resolution was achieved in 55% (12/22) and 75% (6/8) of patients, respectively. ΔNHI and ΔRHI were highly correlated (ρ = 0.91). There was weak to no association between ΔNHI/ΔRHI/ΔES and Δfecal calprotectin (ρ = –0.02 to 0.38), ΔC-reactive protein (ρ = 0.03 to 0.07), Δalbumin (ρ = –0.19 to –0.10), Δhemoglobin (ρ = –0.22 to –0.19), and Δsegmented neutrophils in the blood (ρ = –0.06 to 0.01). Weak correlations were observed between ΔNHI/ΔRHI and ΔES (ρ = 0.26–0.27), Δrectal bleeding (ρ = 0.24–0.28), and Δstool frequency (ρ = 0.40–0.42). Correlations between NHI, RHI/Geboes, and ES with symptomatic outcomes were weak (κ = 0.28–0.45). Difference in the mean grouped by achievement of ΔMCS ≥3 suggests MCIDs in ΔNHI and ΔRHI of 1.2 and 8.6, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): The analysis showed weak to moderate agreement between changes in histologic scores and changes in endoscopic scores, and weak to no agreement between changes in histologic scores and changes in laboratory results at week 14. There was a weak correlation between histologic scores and symptoms at the end of induction. MCID results suggest that both the NHI and RHI appear to effectively evaluate neutrophilic resolution, making the changes in score more clinically interpretable.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».