MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2993677687

National and Global: Twenty-Five Years of Film Studies in a Canadian Context

2016· article· en· W2993677687 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marc Furstenau

Notice bibliographique

RevueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublishingContext (archaeology)Library scienceObligationMedia studiesReading (process)SociologyHistoryPublic relationsPolitical scienceLawComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTIONWith this issue and the next, the Canadian Journal of Film Studies/Revue canadienne d'etudes cinematographiques marks its twenty-fifth year of continuous publication. This has been a collective accomplishment, one achieved by those many individuals who have, for all those years, edited the journal, served on the Editorial Board, managed its finances, submitted the SSHRC publishing grant application, worked as assistants, solicited book reviews, stuffed envelopes and licked stamps, answered letters (and later, emails), designed the covers, made the proofs, maintained the website, and done the many other various tasks that have kept this enterprise going. Most importantly, for twenty-five years, authors have been submitting their articles and reviewers have been reading and evaluating them. That kind of evaluation fulfills what is perhaps the most fundamental scholarly obligation we have, which is review the work of our peers. By doing that, we make possible what is ultimately a collective endeavour: the publication and dissemination of our research and our ideas.Scholarly journals play an indispensible role in the development of disciplines, and over the past twenty-five years the CJFS/RCEC has been a major venue for the work of film scholars in Canada, and from around the world, a site of intellectual and scholarly activity that has played no small part in the growth of film studies in this country. When the journal began publishing two and a half decades ago, there were a few Film Studies departments in Canada offering undergraduate courses, and even some MA programmes. In the intervening years, though, the number of programmes has grown markedly, so that Film Studies is offered at both the undergraduate and graduate level in almost every university in the country, with several new PhD programmes created in the last few years.The CJFS/RCEC is published by the Film Studies Association of Canada/ Association canadienne detudes cinematographiques. Mandated in the FSAC/ ACEC constitution, the publication of a journal was be a major part of the associations effort to foster and advance the study of the history and art of film and related fields. The success of the CJFS/RCEC is revealed most significantly, I think, in the role that it has played-whether directly or indirectly- in the achievement of such a goal, in the flourishing of film and media studies in Canada. From the very beginning, moreover, the journal was bilingual, publishing work in both English and French. The first French articles appeared in 1995, and scholarship in French has since then been regularly published in the journal.While the association was founded in 1977, it was only in 1991 that the journal began publishing. Zuzana Pick was an original member from 1988 of the FSAC/ACEC editorial board, and editor of the CJFS/RCEC from 1993 1997. In her reminiscences from that time, included as part of this twentyfifth anniversary issue, she describes the efforts that she and others-especially Peter Morris, Peter Harcourt, Michael Dorland, Bart Testa, and Peter Rist- made get the journal underway, and notes the and of those early years that ensured its initial success. It is just such teamwork and collegiality that has kept the journal going, providing such an important national venue for Canadian film scholarship. Since the journal was founded, there have been seven editors, and a large number of volunteers who have served on the Editorial Board. Peter Morris was the founding editor, from 1991-1993, followed by Zuzana Pick, from 1993-1996, who consolidated the journal's early success, and then William Wees, from 1996-2008. In 2000, the new position of Managing Editor was created, with Angela Stukator first serving, and then Blaine Allan as both Chair and Managing Editor, from 2002 2009, providing invaluable editorial guidance. Under the direction of Wees and Allan, the journal's reach was significantly expanded, and the journal was re-designed. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,188
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,941

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0070,018
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0430,018
Communication savante0,0250,008
Science ouverte0,0020,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0200,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Même sujetSport and Mega-Event ImpactsTravaux en français237 207