The Effect of Emergency Waiting Time on Patient Satisfaction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTIONHealthcare issues have been a problem for many Americans for years. A number of presidents have tried to reform Healthcare system. Today more people than ever are financially and medically are at risk because they might not be able to effort health insurance and to be treated at earlier stage of their sickness (Glied, 2010). Perhaps, this is one of many reasons that on March 23, 2010, president Obama signed Affordable Care Act which allows for a complete health insurance reforms (The White House, 2010). The promise of this reform is that poor and those who cannot afford medical expenses can get proper health care. However, these law changes do not affect problem that Hospital emergency departments as they are faced today.Without a doubt, when looking at Healthcare reform, we cannot overlook problem of overcrowding and lengthy waiting times in most emergency rooms (Horwitz, 2009). In 2008, a study was conducted by Ontario researchers where they stated, long waiting time not only affects patient satisfaction, and they increase risk of death and hospital readmission for patients who have been discharged from emergency department (Laupacis, 2011). According to American College of Emergency Physicians, emergency room visits will continue to rise, regardless of Healthcare ruling (Cheung-Larivee, 2012). Many Americans today are living without healthcare insurance, so they are using emergency room doctors as their primary physician (The White House, 2010).Statement of ProblemIn 2007, a nationwide Emergency Room Pulse Report was done to examine more than 1.5 million patients treated at 1656 emergency rooms. The experiment findings concluded that:* The average waiting time in emergency rooms was 4 hours, 5 minutes, which has increased by 5 minutes from previous year.* Unpredictability, state by state average waiting times were between 2 hours to 6 hours.* Another important point was that geographic location showed a distinguishing difference in overall satisfaction. In top 10 patient satisfaction report, highest levels were from emergency room in Milwaukee, WI, with New Orleans, LA coming in 5th.* The study showed that a shift in waiting times was main overall issue when dealing with patient satisfaction. It was revealed that Emergency Department could alleviate patient satisfaction even when waiting times were high, by updating patient with information while they were waiting (Emergency Department Resources, 2008).These facts and observation support idea that quality of care and waiting times patients are receiving, should be taken into consideration when looking at patient satisfaction. Indeed, long waiting times have increased risk of mortalities. Today we must consider idea that some people may not mind waiting for care if quality of care is satisfactory.Many hospitals measure waiting times as average time from arrival and check-in, to time when patient is placed in a room and care is started (Shelton, 2013). Nevertheless, there is not a set rule when it comes to how hospitals actually handle emergency room waiting times. According to a new report from 2010 Emergency Department Pulse Report, from moment patients walk into a hospital emergency room until time they are discharged from emergency department, average time spent 4 hours and 5 minutes (Emergency Department Resources, 2009). Many researchers have found that waiting times are different depending on number of patients to be seen, triage procedures, staffing, and availability of beds (Shaikh, 2012). The Press Ganey Association states that to improve patient experience, health care providers must first be able to see and understand the complex relationships between satisfaction, clinical, safety and financial measures (Emergency Department Resources, 2010).Statement of ObjectiveAccording to Board of Health Care Services, one out of every three Americans is visiting hospital emergency department a year, which account for more than 114 million people (HCS, 2007). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».