Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Perched at the Western edge of the MIT campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Kendall Square is a hive of technological activity. Start-ups in biotechnology, computer science, and social networking share space with research laboratories of established pharmaceutical and engineering firms, MIT spillover centers, and offices of overseas governments such as Britain and, recently, Canada. Now the Cambridge Innovation Center (CIC), the organization responsible for attracting start-up firms to the square and incubating them there, is expanding its operations, setting up extra centers as far afield as St. Louis and Baltimore by the end of the year. It is also in talks to establish an overseas outpost in England. For established high-technology firms, the Kendall Square phenomenon represents both threat and promise. On one hand, they face the threat of losing market share to nimble new competitors schooled in the entrepreneurial atmosphere of the square and equipped with a network of colleagues from that environment. On the other hand, they welcome the opportunities to enter new industrial sectors created by the start-ups, and the chance to recruit individuals familiar with the environment and the technologies it has stimulated. Major Technology Presence Corporate inhabitants of Kendall Square enjoy an intellectual ambience stimulated by nearby research universities. MIT is literally next door, and tenants can easily visit colleagues at Harvard University just up the road, Boston University and Boston College across the Charles River, and Tufts University in the nearby town of Medford. They can also recruit technicians and other scientific personnel from local institutions more focused on engineering and technology, such as Northeastern University and the Wentworth Institute of Technology, both in Boston. Largely as a result of that academic concentration, Kendall Square houses the headquarters or research units of several major technology companies, particularly in the biomedical sector. The list includes biotechnology firm Biogen Idec; biomedical giant Johnson & Johnson; and pharmaceutical companies Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi Aventis. IT firms Google and Microsoft have a presence there, as do such nonprofit centers as the Broad Institute, which focuses on biomedical and genomic studies; the Rowland Institute for Science, which carries out a variety of interdisciplinary research; and the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research. The density of technology firms also persuaded the British government to locate the office of its Consulate General in the square rather than in Boston. The combination of universities and technology companies has made Kendall Square a magnet for technology start-ups. Nanobiosym, a company focused on the innovative integration of physics, biomedicine, and nanotechnology recently moved into the square from a Boston suburb; Founder and CEO Anita Goel explains the location's appeal: Everyone's within a mile of us here. You go into the restaurants and coffee shops, and you'll find people who'll discuss scientific issues with you. Start-ups brought into the square by the CIC echo those comments. Our clients frequently tell us that shoulder-rubbing among the investors and other emerging companies located in the center makes CIC an enjoyable place to work, says CIC chief executive Tim Rowe. While there is no expectation to do so, we find clients frequently choose to interact and leverage each other's expertise and networks to uncover new opportunities and build new relationships. Growing Innovative Companies CIC aims to encourage the growth of innovative companies, in addition to rental office space and computational and business services in its multistory building near the center of the square, the center also offers symposia, meetings, and other events, and it has a financial interest in early-stage venture capital funds located in the square. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle