Author's Reply to a Letter to the Editor: “Doctors and Patients Working Together”
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor, I am pleased to know that Mr. Fowler[1] and his family are in good health as a result of receiving good care in Canada. I am moved by his story, but not persuaded. Anecdotal evidence is not a sound basis for public policy decisions any more than it is for medical decisions. The facts that argue against a single-payer system are not clinical, but economic. Mr. Fowler notes that he benefited from MRI technology, one of many American healthcare innovations that are fruits of America's market-based system. Were America to join with the rest of the world, our engine of innovation would be stifled, depriving the entire world of the free ride that it has taken at our expense and collapsing the entire house of cards. Mr. Fowler claims that his taxes are comparable to those in the United States, again based on an anecdotal comparison with a friend in California. The fact is that, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), average Canadians pay 50% higher national and subnational tax rates than their US counterparts. (Please click the link for more information.) Canadians and those in other Western nations are fortunate to have benefited from America's defense shield and the innovations of our market-driven healthcare system. Even so, around the world, socialized systems, collapsing from the weight of the unsustainable economic contradictions of their systems, are desperately trying to return to the discipline of the market. In the United Kingdom, labor has introduced market-based reforms. In Germany, the recent election was a drama of trying to wean the populace from the soothing benefits of socialism. The course of history is clear. Communism and socialism have crumbled and capitalism has prevailed, because it alone recognizes and respects the realities of human nature. Despite these facts, socialist sirens continue to try to lure us toward its rocky shoals, trying to persuade us to burden the taxpayer with billions of dollars of healthcare expense now borne by the private sector. Hopefully, we will have the will to stay true to the principles that have made this nation great – economic and political freedom – as we continue to perfect our system. Readers are encouraged to respond to George Lundberg, MD, Editor of MedGenMed, for the editor's eye only or for possible publication via email: ten.epacsdem@grebdnulg.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».