Parental Involvement, Teacher-Student Relationship and the Scholastic Status of Pre-Calculus Students of Suzhou North America High School
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study aimed at determining the scholastic status of the Pre-Calculus high school students. It also focused on determining the levels of parental involvement and teacher-student relationship as perceived by the students who passed and failed in Pre-Calculus subject during the school year 2016 - 2017, and in designing action plan for parents to help improve the scholastic status of high school students. This study used descriptive method / design. The respondents of the study involved 120 and 15 students who passed and failed respectively in Pre-Calculus subject. The research instrument used in this study was adopted from the authors in [4]. However, questions which the researcher thought not suited or relevant to this study were revised accordingly and were submitted to the experts for comments and verification. The 4th quarter Pre-Calculus grades of the respondents were used as basis for their scholastic status as to whether they passed or failed. The analysis was limited to the parental involvement in terms of parents’ implicit and explicit behavior, parents’ reinforcement and encouragement, and the teacher-student relationship. The study output was an action plan for parents’ activities based on the findings. The data were treated using the percentage distribution for the scholastic status and weighted mean for the levels of parental involvement and teacher-student relationship. The weighted mean was interpreted as follows: 4.21 – 5.00 outstanding 2.61 – 3.40 good 3.41 – 4.20 very good 1.81 – 2.60 fair 1.01 – 1.80 poor From the analysis of the data, the researcher concludes that: 1. Respondents who passed Pre-Calculus had high level perceptions on their parental involvement compared to the respondents who failed in Pre-Calculus subject. 2. Parents’ implicit and reinforcement behaviors were very good as perceived by the students who passed, while good only as perceived by the respondents who failed in Pre-Calculus. 3. Parents’ explicit and encouragement behaviors were perceived good by the students who passed in Pre-Calculus, but fair only by the respondents who failed in such subject. 4. Teacher-student relationship is very good as perceived by the two groups of respondents. 5. Respondents whose perception on their parental involvement is very high tend to have better scholastic performance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».