MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2994156656

Unveiling White Supremacy in the Academy

2016· article· en· W2994156656 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ama Biney

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Pan-African Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueTourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWhite supremacyAfrican descentWhite (mutation)PopulationCurriculumAfrican studiesGender studiesMedia studiesFace (sociological concept)RacismSociologyPolitical scienceHistoryAnthropologySocial scienceLawDemography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

following appeared, April 28, 2016 in Pambazuka News (http://www.pambazuka.org/) and in other international publications. project of genuinely decolonizing the university must be part of an inclusive task to transform the wider society of which the academy is an integral part. It is a long term undertaking which surely starts with the audacity to name the elephant in the room: supremacy. In Britain there has yet to emerge a movement to decolonize British universities, particularly in the fields of African Studies, the Humanities and Social Sciences along with an increased appointment of African scholars in these specific fields. Perhaps the explanation lies in the fact there has not been a civil rights movement in Britain comparable to the struggles in America which demanded Black Studies and African history be taught in American universities in the 1960s and 1970s. People of African-Caribbean and African descent are only 2.8 per cent of the total British population, compared to African Americans, who were approximately 10 per cent of the American population during the 1960s and therefore the demographic weight of African Americans contributed significantly to achievement of their demands for changes in the curriculum. Yet, there is something profoundly disconcerting when one looks online at the faculty of African Studies at the University College London (UCL) and at Oxford and hardly sees an African face within the faculty. I ask you the reader to take 30 seconds and scroll through these links and see for yourself the invisibility of African faces at UCL and Oxford. visibility of African staff may perhaps be found in their cleaning staff, canteens and as security guards. In 2001, the then director-general of the BBC, Greg Dyke, described institution as hideously white and its management structure was more than 98% white. During 2015 the Black British actor, Sir Lenny Henry, called for increasing diversity of ethnic minorities in British television, which raises questions as to how much progress has been made since Dyke made his comment 15 years ago. same hideously white characterization can be made of the current state of British universities. In a discussion with a male colleague who is also a Nigerian social science professor based in Canada, he gave an incisive response after looking at the links to the African Studies faculties at both UCL and Oxford. He replied: There's something fairly pernicious and contemptuously arrogant in sneering ex cathedra way, only the English can affect. In a 2011 Guardian article, it was revealed, The Higher Education Statistics Agency figures show black British professors make up just 0.4% of all British professors--50 out of 14,385. This is despite the fact 2.8% of the population of England and Wales is African or African-Caribbean, according to the Office for National Statistics. Only 10 of the 50 black British professors are women. This is still 0.4% of all 17,375 professors at UK universities. In regards to Black vice-chancellors, there are none. It was only in 2015 Lady Valerie Amos of Guyanese ancestry was appointed the ninth director of the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London. Recent research in the USA has also unearthed low numbers of minority professors across 1500 US colleges. The Imperial/Racial is Linked to the Patriarchal Factor Yash Tandon's critique of Oxford in his recent article entitled, Rhodes Controversy: Storm in Tea Cup? that the educational system at Oxford University is fundamentally conservative almost reactionary, was almost spot on. However, in his analysis of the imperial/racial factor at Oxford (and many other UK universities), he fails to see the imperial/racial factor is inextricably linked to the patriarchal factor. Neither does he address the lack of African people in the above mentioned African Studies Centre at Oxford. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,955
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,057

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0450,027
Communication savante0,0160,008
Science ouverte0,0010,017
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,354
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Pan-African StudiesMême sujetTourism, Volunteerism, and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207