MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2994364410

Desenvolvimento do Turismo e Efeitos sobre o Ambiente Econômico Urbano: Análise de Estudos Indexados na Base Scopus / Tourism Development and its Effects on the Urban Economic Environment: Indexed Studies Analysis in Scopus Database

2019· article· pt· W2994364410 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alan Aparecido Guizi

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2019
Typearticle
Languept
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTourismScopusWelfare economicsEconomicsPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

RESUMOO presente estudo volta-se para a compreensão do desenvolvimento da atividade turística e possíveis impactos sobre o ambiente econômico urbano, por meio de pesquisa e coleta de estudos publicados em periódicos estrangeiros indexados na plataforma de pesquisa Scopus. Apresenta-se a análise dos artigos coletados em quatro seções temáticas distintas, porém interligadas, com foco econômico, além do marco teórico relacionado ao turismo em áreas urbanas, para embasar as análises e compreensão do tema proposto. Ao final, notou-se que, para muitos contextos de destinos, o turismo é compreendido como uma atividade de considerável importância econômica, mas carece de planejamento detalhado e sistemático com vistas a prever e mitigar efeitos nocivos da atividade sobre a cidade, para além dos fatores econômicos, como os sociais e culturais.PALAVRAS-CHAVETurismo Urbano. Urban Tourism. Desenvolvimento. Development. Economia Urbana. Urban Economy. Scopus. ABSTRACTThis study aimed to understand the tourism activity development and its possible impacts on the urban economic environment, through research and collection of studies published in international journals and indexed in the Scopus research platform, presenting papers collected analysis through four different thematic sections but interconnected, with economic focus, as well a theoretical description about tourism in urban areas, to provide background to the analysis and comprehension of this topic. In the end, was observed that for many destinations around the world, tourism is seen as an important economic activity, but it’s necessary a detailed and systematic planning to predict and mitigate the harmful effects, not only to the urban economy, but also to social and cultural factors in a city.KEYWORDSUrban Tourism. Development. Urban Economy. Scopus. AUTORIAAlan Aparecido Guizi – Mestre. Doutorando, Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal. Professor na Universidade Anhembi Morumbi, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. Currículo: http://lattes.cnpq.br/0290102758341785 E-mail: alanguizi@gmail.com REFERENCIASAcerenza, M. Á. (2006). Conceptualización, origen Y evolución del turismo. México: Trillas.Aliaskarov, D., Beisenova, A., Irkitbaev, S., Atasoy, E., & Wiskulki, T. (2017). Modern changes in Zhezkazgan City: Positive and negative factors of tourism development (Kazakhstan). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 20(2), 243–253. LinkAshworth, G., & Page, S. J. (2011). Urban tourism research: Recent progress and current paradoxes. Tourism Management, 32(1), 1-15. Link Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21(1), 97-116. LinkButler, R. W. (1980). The Concept of an Area Cycle Of Evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer, 24, 5-12. LinkChang, T. C., Milne, S., Fallon, D., & Pohlmann, C. (1996). Urban heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 284-305. LinkChapman, A., & Light, D. (2016). Exploring the tourist destination as a mosaic: The alternative lifecycles of the seaside amusement arcade sector in Britain. Tourism Management, 52(February), 254-263. LinkDeng, H., Liu, T., & Zhao, J. (2011). Strategic measures for an integrated approach to sustainable development in Lijiang City. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 18(6), 559-562. Link Fillipim, M., Hoffmann, V., & Alberton, A. (2006). Turismo rural em fazendas-hotel: um estudo das características da demanda e fatores de influência no Planalto Serrano e Meio-Oeste de SC. Turismo - Visão e Ação, 8(1), 31-46. LinkFistola, R., & La Rocca, R. A. (2017). Driving functions for urban sustainability: The double-edged nature of urban tourism. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(3), 425-434. Link Garrigós-Simón, F. J., Galdón-Salvador, J. L., & Gil-Pechuán, I. (2015). The economic sustainability of tourism growth through leakage calculation. Tourism Economics, 21(4), 721-739. LinkGotham, K. F. (2005). Tourism from above and below: Globalization, localization and New Orleans’s Mardi Gras. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(2), 309-326. LinkHampton, M. P. (2003). Entry points for local tourism in developing countries: Evidence from yogyakarta, Indonesia. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 85(2), 85-101. LinkHayllar, B., & Griffin, T. (2005). The precinct experience: A phenomenological approach. Tourism Management, 26(4), 517-528. LinkJoksimović, M., Golić, R., Vujadinović, S., Šabić, D., Jovanović Popović, D., & Barnfield, G. (2014). Restoring tourist flows and regenerating city’s image: the case of Belgrade. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(3), 220-233. LinkKhazaei, A., Elliot, S., & Joppe, M. (2015). An application of stakeholder theory to advance community participation in tourism planning: the case for engaging immigrants as fringe stakeholders. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(7), 1049-1062. LinkLi, L., & Tao, W. (2003). Spatial structure evolution of system of recreation business district. Chinese Geographical Science, 13(4), 370-377. LinkLiu, Y. De. (2010). Planning considerations of urban cultural tourism: a case study of four UK cities. International Journal of Tourism Policy, 3(2), 113-124. LinkMartí, P., Nolasco-Cirugeda, A., & Serrano-Estrada, L. (2017). Assessment tools for urban sustainability policies in Spanish Mediterranean tourist areas. Land Use Policy, 67(April), 625-639. LinkMbaiwa, J. E., Toteng, E. N., & Moswete, N. (2007). Problems and prospects for the development of urban tourism in Gaborone and Maun, Botswana. Development Southern Africa, 24(5), 725-740. LinkMerinero-Rodríguez, R., & Pulido-Fernández, J. I. (2016). Analysing relationships in tourism: A review. Tourism Management, 54, 122-135. LinkMiralles, J., & García-Ayllón, S. (2013). The economic sustainability in urban planning: The case of La Manga. Sustainable Development and Planning, 173, 575-587. LinkOpschoor, H., & Tang, L. (2011). Growth, world heritage and sustainable development: The case of Lijiang City, China. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 18(6), 469-473. LinkPage, S. (1989). Tourist development in London Docklands in the 1980s and 1990s. GeoJournal, 19(3), 291-295. LinkRazali, M. K., & Ismail, H. N. (2014). A sustainable urban tourism indicator in Malaysia. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 187(6), 133-145. LinkSantos, M. (2003). Economia espacial: críticas e alternativas. São Paulo: Edusp.Severo, E. A., Dorion, E. C. H., Guimarães, J. C. F. d., Souza, R. A. d., & Severo, P. O. (2016). Trajetórias da inovação : uma análise na base de dados Scopus. Revista Espacios, 37(11), 1-13. LinkSheng, L. (2011). Foreign investors versus local business: An urban economics model for tourist cities. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13(July 2010), 32-40. LinkSteel, G. (2013). Mining and tourism: Urban transformations in the intermediate cities of Cajamarca and Cusco, Peru. Latin American Perspectives, 40(2), 237-249. LinkUNWTO - United Nations World Tourism Organization (2017). UNWTO Annual Report 2016. LinkUpchurch, R. S., & Teivane, U. (2000). Resident perceptions of tourism development in Riga, Latvia. Tourism Management, 21(5), 499-507. LinkWTTC - World Travel & Tourism Council. (2018). Travel & Tourism: Economic Impact 2018 World. London. LinkXiao, G., & Wall, G. (2009). Urban tourism in Dalian, China. Anatolia, 20(1), 178-195. Link PROCESSO EDITORIALRecebido: 5 MAI 18; Avaliado: FEV-ABR; Aceito: 15 JUL 19

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,045
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmericanae (AECID Library)Même sujetDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchTravaux en français237 207