MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2994460763

A Multivariate Garch Analysis of International Value and Growth Equity Returns and Volatility

2012· article· en· W2994460763 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Javad Kashefi

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of international business research · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineDecision Sciences
ThématiqueStock Market Forecasting Methods
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEconomicsAutoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityEconometricsHeteroscedasticityFinancial economicsVolatility (finance)Equity (law)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Recent advances in autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (ARCH) and generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (GARCH) models allows to study the conditional volatility of stock markets and ascertain the predictability of future stock return volatility conditional on past volatilities and return shocks [see, for instance, Tse and Zuo (1996), Aggarwal et al. (1999), Adrangi et al. (1999) and Huang and Yang (2000)]. A few studies have even extended these to the multivariate case [see, for example, Tse (2000) and Tay and Zhu (2000)]. However, relatively few studies have applied asymmetric GARCH models to the international value and growth indexes. And even when these models are applied in a broader context (that is, along with North American and European markets) there is generally an emphasis on broad indexes. As far as the author is aware, no study to date has examined the risk-return relation between growth and value stocks separately. DATA AND SUMMARY STATISTICS The data employed in the study is drawn from Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) and encompasses the period monthly returns from January 1997 to October 2007. MSCI indices are widely employed in the literature on equity market comovements and volatility on the basis of the degree of comparability and avoidance of dual listing [see, for instance, Meric and Meric (1997), Yuhn (1997), Roca (1999) and Cheung and Ho (1991)]. In this study, monthly returns of fifty international value and growth equity markets from 1994 to 2007 have been used. Even though, it has been argued that return data is preferred to the lower frequency data such as weekly and monthly returns because longer horizon returns can obscure transient responses to innovations which may last for a few days only (Elyasiani et al. 1998: 94). However, Roca (1999: 505), amongst others, has countered that ...daily data are deemed to contain 'too much noise' and is affected by the day-of-the-week effect. Another reason for using monthly data is that with daily data from many countries, the trading hours generally are in different time zones it is not possible to implement directly a portfolio strategy of buying one market at trading time, t, and selling it at the close of trading time t + 1.In addition, most of international asset pricing modes monthly data to measure the stock returns. Table 1 presents descriptive statistics for each return series for the period 1997 to 2007. Samples means, medians, maximums, minimums, standard deviations, skewness, kurtosis and the Jacque-Bera statistic and p-value are reported for the monthly returns. The highest mean returns are in Finland growth (1.492%), Austria value (1.353%), Denmark value (1.15%), France value (1.01%) and finally Italy with 1.00%. Monthly returns are also higher on average across the Asian-Australian markets (7.183%) than in the European markets (6.698%) and North American countries of Canada and USA (6.047%). As anticipated, volatility (as measured by standard deviation) is on average higher among the Asia-Australia markets (Singapore growth index 10.81% and Hong Kong value index 9.59%) in comparison with the European and North American markets. However, the highest volatility (13.1%) is exhibited by Finland growth index. A visual perspective on the volatility of returns can be gained from the plots of monthly returns for each series in Figure 1. These findings are in accordance with international analysis of equity returns and volatility by Erb et al (1996). The distributional properties of the return series generally appear to be non-normal. All of the markets have negative skewness with the exception of Finland value, Hong Kong value, Italy growth and Japan value. Positive and/or negative skewness in Asian equity returns have been documented by Huang and Yang (2000) and Tay and Zhu (2000), amongst others. The kurtosis, or degree of excess, in all markets, except Austria growth, Australia growth, Japan value and growth, Switzerland growth and United Kingdom growth have exhibited a leptokurtic distribution. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,038
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,074
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesMétarecherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,990

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0380,074
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,332
Tête enseignante GPT0,558
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of international business researchMême sujetStock Market Forecasting MethodsTravaux en français237 207