Sweden's Art and Music Schools and Compulsory Schools: The Collaboration Discourse
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sweden’s Art and Music Schools offer courses and activities after the school day. Besides that, Art and Music Schools also work in collaboration with compulsory schools, including training schools and special schools. The investigation report on Art and Music Schools, part of the national policy process, focuses on the ‘after school’ parts of Art and Music Schools, leaving the other parts untouched, as the investigation considers that the voluntary after school activities/programs constitute the core of Art and Music Schools. The present paper focuses on how Art and Music Schools work in collaboration with compulsory schools, as a way to include all children, and departs from the troubling information provided by extant research that confirms that the dominant Art and Music School discourse is sharply separated from a compulsory school discourse.Discourse analysis, discursive psychology and educational policy theory will constitute the theoretical framework. Specifically, the paper will make use of the vast literature on policy conflict and deliberation in order to make sense of the tensions and produc- tive actions currently emerging as educational and arts policy face greater demands to address inclusion in its many forms.This paper presentation investigates the discourses that emerge when Art and Music School leaders talk about inclusion in relation to national policy process. The data informing the present paper consist of three focus groups with a total of sixteen Art and Music School leaders from northern, central and southern Sweden. Anal- ysis is guided and informed by the following research question: how do Art and Music School leaders talk about inclusion and pol- icy when describing their own schools?The results challenge the antagonism between the Art and Music School discourse and the compulsory school discourses, exposing (i) a collaboration discourse connected to inclusion; and (ii) ten- sions between policy and inclusion discourses. While the findings emerge out of the Swedish context, they can be seen to be rep- resentative to the international music community, as specialized Art and Music Schools and music curricula within-outside schools are realities present in music education field writ large. Finally, as this presentation draws from a collaboration between two music education researchers—one in Northern Europe and one in North America—a comparative exploration of policy and inclusion in both contexts will also be presented. The paper presentation will provide suggestions for similar analysis internationally and offer specific policy action implications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».