Teacher Professional Learning, Agency, and Identity in a Research-Practice Partnership: A Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Analysis of Enacted Design-Based Professional Learning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research-Practice Partnerships (RPPs) are an emerging practice in Alberta, Canada, and internationally. In RPPs, researchers and teachers collaborate to address messy problems of practice in naturalized settings. Ideally, the enactment of partner research initiatives leads to a reciprocal and mutually beneficial learning process for researchers and practitioners to improve practice and inform theory. However, there can be challenges to creating effective research partnerships. While a number of RPPs utilize participatory research approaches to advance theory and practice, little is known about how they impact teacher professional learning and how they are experienced by teachers in schools. This case study of an RPP between the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary, the Galileo Educational Network Association, and a large urban school district in Western Canada examined: (a) how the RPP was initiated, enacted, and assessed; (b) how teachers learned as a result of participating; and (c) how professional knowledge developed by participant teachers was shared and supported at the school level. RPPs can be examined as transformative interventions for expansive learning in schools. By applying cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) to the enactment of the RPP, this research developed an understanding of how participation in the RPP led to deep teacher professional learning and how teachers experienced improved agency impacting their professional identity within their school activity system as a result. By employing case study as a methodology, this research developed a thick description of teacher professional learning, agency, and identity within the RPP that was initiated to improve the assessment literacy of 26 junior high school teachers from five schools through sustained design-based professional learning. Findings illustrate that teacher professional learning in the RPP was characteristic of effective professional learning in the literature reviewed, and in addition, employed teacher leadership as a means of deepening teacher learning. Findings also show that teacher participants in this RPP played an important boundary-crossing role between the school and university activity systems requiring them to negotiate, translate, and contextualize their learning into the naturalized setting of their school, resulting in changes in their classroom practice, improved agency in their schools, and shifting professional identities. Study findings can be used to inform the design of teacher professional learning, instructional and teacher leadership practices, and the design and enactment of future RPPs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,037 | 0,036 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,052 |
| Communication savante | 0,021 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».