Genetic screen to identify novel potential regulators of dorsal closure in "Drosophila melanogaster"
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dorsal closure of the Drosophila embryo represents the best characterized example of epithelial movement and fusion.This is due to the advanced genetics which allowed the identification of numerous genes that participate in dorsal closure.A deeper knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that drive dorsal closure leads also to a better understanding of other similar epithelial closure events such as wound healing and other processes that involve cell shape changes in general.The small Rho GTPases Drac1 and Dcdc42 are essential regulators of actin cytoskeleton dynamics and therefore are also key players in dorsal closure.To identify novel signaling components of Drac1 and Dcdc42 that potentially act during dorsal closure, we performed a genetic screen.To this end, we misexpressed dominant negative forms of either Drac1 or Dcdc42 (Drac1 N17 or Dcdc42 N17 ) specifically in the eye by using the Gal4/UAS-system.As a consequence, the resulting tester flies displayed eyes with a disrupted structure ("rough eye" phenotype) that was used as a starting point for a gain-of-function screen.Approximately 10'000 flies with random insertions of a UAS-containing enhancer promoter (EP) element were crossed to the Drac1 N17 or Dcdc42 N17 tester flies and the F1 generation was screened for modification of the rough eye phenotype.We selected modifiers that improved eye structure, i.e. suppressed the rough eye phenotype.Modification of the rough eye phenotype is supposed to be caused by EP dependent transcription of a nearby gene.These genes thus encode potential Drac or Dcdc42 signaling components.The decision to screen for eye (instead of dorsal closure) phenotype modifications was motivated, first, by the viability of the corresponding tester lines that made it possible to screen the F1 generation and, second, by the relative ease to examine the subtle eye phenotype modifications -to score for a partial suppression of the severe dorsal closure phenotypes caused by Drac1 N17 or Dcdc42 N17 embryonic overexpression was supposed to be too demanding and time consuming for this kind of large scale screening.This approach led to the identification of 17 genes, none of which has been previously reported to interact with Drac1 or Dcdc42.Their potential role in dorsal closure has not yet been investigated except for one suppressor gene: falafel.Loss-of-function mutations in falafel were generated that indeed resulted in various defects in dorsal closure besides other phenotypes.Thus this genetic approach identified at least one novel gene implicated in dorsal closure that probably would not have been picked up in conventional loss-of-function screens as its mutant phenotype is pleiotropic.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».