Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There are many controversial topics in the care of critically ill children in pediatric critical care units that will influence the decisions of care made in the daily management of these patients. Health care professionals working in pediatric intensive care are faced with patients with different underlying pathophysiology from adults with a wide range of patient age from 0 to 18 years. This can cause uncertainty among health care professionals concerning the optimal treatment of various clinical scenarios. The authors of Pediatric Critical Care—Current Controversies are recognized and internationally renowned experts in their respective fields who provide an excellent review of problems health care professionals caring for children in the critical care unit experience in their daily practice. The textbook is divided into 8 sections that deal with a variety of diseases and diagnostic dilemmas. The sections are divided according to organ systems, including respiratory and cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, hematological, immunological, endocrine, and neurological issues. Each chapter provides up-to-date diagnostic and treatment approaches for health care professionals working in the pediatric intensive care unit. This is an easy-to-read book about complex pathophysiology and treatment strategies. It is accompanied by illustrations and tables, which simplifies the delivered message. Furthermore, in each chapter, a case report is discussed and is supported by current evidence from the most important and most recent publications, along with expert opinion from the wealth of experience of the authors. At the end of each chapter, there are take-home messages. This approach provides the reader with a more in-depth understanding on how to treat these specific patients. It should also be noted that the important topics of nutritional support, fluid overload, and sedation are found prominently in the book, emphasizing the need for consistent management and implementation of institutional protocols to improve outcome in these critically ill pediatric patients. The diagnosis of brain death for the purpose of organ donation is an ethically difficult topic that provides the basis for an in-depth discussion using several patient scenarios. One weakness appears to be the lack of inclusion of surgical issues in neonatal patients (eg, necrotizing enterocolitis and gastroschisis). Indeed, many pediatric intensive care units also care for neonatal patients in general and surgical patients more specifically. Care of such patients includes optimal surgical management along with optimal ventilation strategies (eg, targeted tidal volume) and feeding management. Pediatric Critical Care—Current Controversies provides an excellent and detailed overview and is a valuable educational and practical resource for residents, critical care fellows, critical care attending physicians, and anyone else who is involved in the treatment of critically ill pediatric patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. Georg M. Schmölzer, MD, PhDCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and ResuscitationNeonatal Research UnitRoyal Alexandra HospitalEdmonton, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of PediatricsUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, Alberta, Canada[email protected]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».