MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2997115655 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz156

Reflections for my junior colleagues

2020· article· en· W2997115655 sur OpenAlexaff
Paul Thiessen

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHistory of Medical Practice
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Paul Thiessen (MD, FRCPC) Paul Thiessen (MD, FRCPC) In reflecting on my 40 years of general paediatric practice here in Vancouver, there are a number of factors that stand out as contributing to the personal satisfaction I have experienced. Following my medical school at the University of Alberta, and my paediatrics residency in Vancouver (junior years) and the Hospital for Sick Children (senior years), I did a further year as a clinical assistant in neonatology in the NICU in Vancouver before joining my group practice in 1979. My practice group began in the pre-medicare era in 1955, when two paediatricians joined together and decided to adopt the model whereby they would work the same amounts of time in the hospital and office, and divide all income equally regardless of their individual billings. (The senior member of that original duo—who trained under Virginia Apgar in New York—is still alive and compos mentis at 94). This model of a shared group practice has persisted over the decades, and has served us marvelously as it creates a healthy and ongoing interdependence. Working in this manner means we rely heavily on our partners to assume full care and responsibility for our patients when we are unavailable, which means we do not need to worry about coverage when we are on vacation. This brings me to my first bit of advice for new colleagues entering practice—make every attempt not to practice alone. While unquestionably you relinquish some autonomy to practice with a partner or in a group, the benefits in collegiality and peace of mind regarding holidays and time off is abundantly worth any sacrifice of independence, AND you always have colleagues readily at hand to whom you can pose questions and discuss difficult cases. The latter benefit has been amplified greatly in my practice by adopting the use of Whatsapp to allow immediate access to your partners, and we have further enhanced the functionality of this tool by adopting separate chats for handover, scheduling, and social exchanges. Sir William Osler once wisely observed that “It is astonishing with how little reading a doctor can practice medicine, but it is not astonishing how badly he may do it”. One of my most important admonitions to colleagues commencing their careers is NEVER STOP READING. Not only is it deeply satisfying to stay abreast of emerging knowledge but it truly makes you a better doctor and it will gain you respect in the eyes of your patients. All medical journals will send you an e-reminder of their monthly table of contents, and I would urge you to take advantage of this. At the minimum subscribe to the alerts from Journal of Pediatrics, Pediatrics, Paediatrics and Child Health, NEJM and the AAP Daily Briefing. The single most helpful tool I have acquired in recent years to help me stay abreast of the medical literature is READ by QXMD (https://qxmd.com/read-by-qxmd). This is a free app which you can configure to your university library proxy server which allows you direct access to medical journal articles. I couldn’t live without it and heartily recommend it! Another piece of advice I would give is to proactively reach out and teach others in every clinical encounter, including medical students, residents, midwives, nurses, allied health, and of course the patients and families with whom you interact. I have found that folks at every level are very grateful when you make that additional effort to teach them, and the thinking process you engage in to teach helps to embed the knowledge in your mind. Others taught you and me at every step of the way as we advanced in our careers, and I would suggest that we should feel a gentle but steady obligation to pay back and teach others. Be constantly vigilant that what you are doing and teaching withstands the scrutiny of evidence, as pointed out so eloquently in Groopman’s superb book ‘How doctors think’. I love the quote attributed variously to several authors but most probably originating from Mark Twain—‘It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble, but what you know for sure that just ain’t so’. I self- consciously recall the way we confidently employed croup tents and suctioned the trachea of every newborn delivering through meconium with utter conviction that we were doing the right thing—until emerging evidence disproved it. Generously prescribing ranitidine and PPIs for fussy/crying babies is another current practice that is increasingly being discredited. Stay up to date! The ‘golden rule’ lies at the heart of civil behaviour, whereby you treat others as you wish to be treated. So in the same way that you benefit greatly from the efforts of others who work on your behalf to make the hospital and professional societies function effectively, I would encourage you to adopt an attitude of willingness to contribute by serving on committees, task forces etc. that ensure the effective functioning of our institutions. If you have been imbued with leadership skills, step to the plate and use them so others can benefit. Our provincial fee schedule in BC was greatly enhanced by the tireless efforts of individuals who worked selflessly and skillfully over the years to negotiate with the other sections in our provincial medical association—who are all jockeying to achieve maximal financial compensation for their members. I would encourage you to recognize and thank others for their hard work and be willing to roll up your sleeves and make a contribution. Progress does not emerge from inertia but rather from individuals making extra efforts. In the realm of work/life balance, I would urge you to develop the habit of daily aerobic exercise, as I firmly believe that you should do some activity every day that elevates your heart rate and makes you sweat. Make exercise an integral part of your daily routine like brushing your teeth and not an optional ‘I’ll do it if I can find the time’. The theologian Joan Chittchester once remarked that ‘you have all the time there is—you just need to decide how to use it’. I have observed that many who bemoan their inability to fit exercise into their day’s routine somehow find considerable time for TV and social media. There is abundant evidence that exercise improves the brains ability to focus and stay on task. My aerobic activities of choice have varied over the years with the ages of my children, but now include tennis, squash, hiking and swimming. If you are skeptical I would encourage you to read the book ‘Spark’ by John Ratey, a psychiatrist from Harvard who has devoted his career to exploring the benefits of exercise for the brain. (He says that “exercise is Miracle Gro for the brain”). Exercise is particularly important in this era when the seduction of screen activities tempts us to be increasingly sedentary. There is no app that will do this—we all need to keep moving! Find activities outside of your medical world that challenge you and keep your mind engaged, preferably including friends who are outside your medical circle. Plato said that ‘The mind ought sometimes to be diverted that it may return the better to thinking’, and these words ring as true today as when he expounded them in the third century BC. Your diversion of choice may be sports, crafts, music, dance, theater, art, reading, writing, restoring cars, etc.—but you need diversions. My favourites are reading, music, and film—and in particular foreign films. I belong to a men’s book club that has been extant for over 20 years and is a highly valued source of personal stimulation and companionship. The French renaissance philosopher Montaigne said ‘It is good to rub and polish our brain against that of others’, and a book club truly enhances the opportunity to do that. Consider a period of voluntary service abroad, as mutual exchanges with colleagues in other countries (Honduras, Ecuador, India, Ukraine, and Uganda) have greatly expanded my awareness of the immense challenges they face and the great privilege afforded me of practicing medicine in our economically advantaged society. Finally treat your office staff well and remunerate them generously, and you will be rewarded with their loyalty and hard work. I retired from my hospital practice in June 2019 after 40 years, and I look back on my career with deep gratitude. Dostoyevsky once presciently observed that ‘The soul is healed by being with children’, and I have found these words to be emphatically true. Dr. Thiessen obtained his undergraduate and medical degrees at the University of Alberta, followed by his junior years of paediatric residency training in Vancouver and his senior years at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. He has spent his career as the member of a group of general consulting paediatricians in Vancouver with a strong emphasis in newborn care. He was the Medical Director of the Intermediate Nursery at BC Women’s Hospital from 1996 to 2012 and was instrumental in establishing a ward at BC Women’s Hospital in 2001 devoted entirely to the care of mothers and infants with substance use issues. He was the Medical Director of the Spinal Cord Clinic at BC Children’s Hospital for over 25 years, retiring in 2016. He has been actively involved with the Canadian Paediatric Society throughout his career, and is currently serving as a member of the Board of Directors and the executive, as well as a member of the Board of the BC Pediatric Society. Paul has been a well appreciated co-host of the CPS AGM Goldbloom Journal Club for the past several years.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,016
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,109
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,056
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,188

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0160,109
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0190,014
Communication savante0,0210,013
Science ouverte0,0040,021
Intégrité de la recherche0,0330,088
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0560,036

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,064
Tête enseignante GPT0,385
Écart entre enseignants0,321 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child Health→Même sujetHistory of Medical Practice→Travaux en français237 207→