MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2997723690 · doi:10.22378/he.2019-4-2.294-311

Old Tatar Quarter of Kazan – the center of Tatar education of the 19th – early 20th centuries (historical overview of educational institutions)

2019· article· en· W2997723690 sur OpenAlex
Elmira K. Salakhova

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistorical Ethnology · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducational Practices and Challenges
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTatarQuarter (Canadian coin)Center (category theory)Political scienceHistoryArchaeologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Old Tatar Quarter is the historical center of modern Kazan, where architec-tural monuments preserving the centuries-old history of the Tatar people have been preserved. The formation of the settlement is associated with dramatic events in the history of our people. After the fall of the Kazan Khanate in 1552, the life of the Tatar society moved to the settlement, located behind the Kaban lake. By the end of the 16th century. The Old Tatar Quarter becomes a kind of Muslim suburbian area of Kazan. The first mosque and the first Muslim educational institutions were opened in that territory. For several centuries, the Old Tatar Quarter was the educational and cultural center of Tatars. The study of the religious life of the Old Tatar Quarter is an important subject for researchers. Residents of this settlement were able not only to preserve, but also to develop the urban culture of the Tatar population in Kazan. There they built mosques, opened the mektep and madrasas, created material conditions to maintain their exis¬tence. The study is novel in that it is a comprehensive review of the formation and development of the Tatar enlightenment in the separately considered Old Tatar Quarter of Kazan in the the 19th – early 20 th centuries. The purpose of this publication is to study and analyze the history of establishing and developing educational institutions – mektebe and madrasas, to show their significance in the religious life of the Tatar-Muslim community. To achieve this goal, a number of tasks were set. It is a well-known fact that the history of educational institutions among the Tatars is closely connected with the history of mosques formation. A vast majority of schools opened at mosques. Madrasas, as the middle and higher levels of education of shakirds, although formally considered independent institutions, nevertheless, their creation and development is directly related to religious institutions. The educational process was provided by the clerics of mosques – Imam-khatiba. Therefore, from our perspectibe, the history of educational institutions formation should be studied in conjunction with the history of mosques. The study examines 10 mahallas and mosques located on the territory of the Old Tatar Quarter. When the author provides information about the mosque of a certain mahalla, he also reveals the history of the establishment and development of an educational institution belonging to this mahalla. The author also considers the transition from radimitschi to djadidists method of teaching in madrasas settlement. The article investigates the periods of cultural and educational development of the Old Tatar settlement. The first mosque, now called the Marjani mosque, became the first religious building on the territory of the settlement, not far behind, the Apanaev mosque was built. Famous educational institutions opened on the facilities of mosques and successfully competed with other educational institutions of the Muslim world in the Russian Empire. The madrasas of Marjani, Apanaev madrasa are indicative of that. The article also provides detailed information on the madrasa: Muhammadiya, Khalidiya, Gaffariya, Utyasheva madrasa , Guzmaniya, etc. It should be noted that the names of some madrasas have changed, the same madrasas in different periods are indicated in the sources under different names. It is also explained by the author of the publication. The author on the example of large madrasas shows teaching methods, their changes in connection with the requirements of time. The materials of the study make it possible to present the organization of the educational process in mektebs and madrasas, to trace the dynamics of the growth of the number of shakirds or their decline in different periods. Since organization of the educational process in all madrasas was approximately the same, a detailed description of the educational process in each madrasa would be unnecessary, therefore, the author focused on other significant facts. Archival sources at the madrasa Casamia give an opportunity to create a complete view on the problems of implementing the Russian language in the madrasas and the perception of shakerdom a new subject. The same situation with the Russian language developed in other madrasas. Madrasas and mekteps prepared educated young people, who by the beginning of the 20th century constituted the most active part of the Tatar intelligentsia. They became prominent scholars, writers, teachers, and cultural figures. Moreover, the author under the texts about madrasas lists prominent graduates of these Muslim educational institutions. The creation of mosques, madrasas, their maintenance would have been impossible without the participation of the wealthy stratum of Tatar society. Mention of the names of merchants and entrepreneurs Yunusov, Arsaev, Mustafin, Asimov and many other benefactors complements our knowledge of the history of education of the Tatars. The research is based primarily on archival documents, as well as on scientific literature on the given subject.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,901
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,992

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,066
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,292 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle