Duration of Bisphosphonate Treatment for Patients with Osteoporosis: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Throughout life bone tissue is constantly formed and resorbed; however, with age this process becomes less effective. Osteoporosis is a bone disease characterised by a deterioration of bone tissue in which bones become progressively less dense and more fragile. When bones are severely weakened by osteoporosis they can fracture easily as a result of minimal trauma (such as falling from standing). Despite overall skeletal fragility, fractures of the wrist, shoulder, vertebrae and hip are those most commonly associated with osteoporosis.,Osteoporosis can affect Canadians of all ages; though, it is more common in those 50 years or older. In this population, it is estimated there were 57,413 hospitalizations for a total of 832,594 days from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008, costing $1.181 billion (2010 Canadian dollars) in emergency care, acute care admissions, and same day surgeries. Furthermore, females are disproportionately affected then males., There are many risk factors for osteoporosis, including cigarette smoking, long term use of corticosteroids or other high risk medications, and insufficient dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D., The presence of these, along with findings from a physical examination and laboratory investigations, may prompt further investigation with a bone mineral density (BMD) test using a dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method. A DXA t-score result between −1 and – 2.5 standard deviations indicates low bone mass (osteopenia), while osteoporosis is a t-score at or below –2.5 standard deviations., This report will focus on patients with osteoporosis.The goals of therapy for patients with osteoporosis include the prevention of fractures, prevention of associated disability and loss of independence, as well as the preservation or enhancement of bone mass. There are several pharmacological treatments for established osteoporosis, such as: bone resorption inhibitors, which slow down bone loss (e.g., bisphosphonates [BIS], denosumab, raloxifene, and estrogen), as well as bone formation agents, which stimulate the formation of bone tissue (e.g., teriparatide). This report will focus on the BIS class of pharmaceuticals, which are the mainstay of osteoporosis treatment and include: alendronate (ALN), etidronate (ETN), risedronate (RSN), and zoledronic acid (ZLN).As with any drug therapy, there are adverse effects (AE) associated with BISs and their antifracture benefits ought to be weighed against any possible risks to the patient. Because of concerns about serious AEs, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), atrial fibrillation, and atypical femoral fractures (AFF), there have been suggestions of implementing drug holidays as part of the therapy, where the medication is stopped for a period of time, often several years.,,– However, the optimal duration of therapy before a drug holiday could be considered and the length of the drug holiday (either indefinite or otherwise), is uncertain and remains a clinical controversy.CADTH has previously reviewed the evidence for the use of bisphosphonates.– One report was a list of abstracts based on evidence available in August of 2019, one focused on a different patient population (patients with osteopenia and low risk fractures), and another focused on prevention of osteoporosis in patients treated with systemic corticosteroids. The objective of the current report is to evaluate the clinical evidence and evidence-based guidelines regarding various treatment durations of BISs for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».