P306 Frequency and structure of extra-intestinal manifestations in IBD
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background IBD are immunomediated diseases that usually manifest at an early age, require lifelong pathogenetic therapy and significantly reduce the quality of life of a patient. Methods Since February 2017, the ‘North-West register of IBD patients’ has installed data of 1130 patients with an introduced diagnosis of UC or CD: 41.3% of them are patients with a diagnosis of CD and 58.7%—with a diagnosis of UC. Results Among patients with IBD the majority had mild (33.4%) and moderate activity (34%), a quarter was in remission and 7.65%—expressed activity. A population researches study using the University of Manitoba’s IBD epidemiology database (UMIBDED) reported that 6.2% of IBD patients had at least one extraintestinal manifestation, and 0.3% had several. The extraintestinal manifestations were observed in 43.4% of patients; meanwhile, 25% of them revealed mostly than one extraintestinal manifestation. System manifestations were more often registered in CD than in UC. The most frequent extraintestinal manifestations were signs of involvement of skeletal and muscular system. On the first place, it is peripheral arthropathy (73.6%), sacroiliitis (8.8%), ankylosing spondyloarthritis (8.8%), entezitis (10.3%) rheumatoid arthritis (1.5%), dactylitis (1.5%) were less frequent. Generally, articulate manifestations were noted by 17.5% of all included patients. In CD and UC, extra-intestinal manifestations were more often common in patients with a moderate attack (in 75.6 % and 51.6% of cases). In CD, extra-intestinal manifestations were more often frequent in patients with moderate attack −50.8%, in patients in remission there numbered to 32.8%, in severe attack-14.8%, in mild-1.6%. In UC, extra-intestinal manifestations were observed in severe attack in 2.6%, in moderate attack 35.9%, in mild attack 41%, in patients in remission 20.5%. Conclusion Among patients with IBD, extraintestinal manifestations, among which joint lesions prevail, are detected in 43.4% of the examined persons. The trend is noted to reduce the number of patients with severe attacks of the disease and extraintestinal manifestations, that can be related with improving the quality of diagnosis, reduction of terms of diagnosing and developing new methods of treatment for IBD. Peripheral arthropathy predominate among the extra-intestinal manifestations. We found no correlation between the severity of IBD and the presence of extra-intestinal manifestations. The spectrum of extra-intestinal manifestations includes more than 20 manifestations (diseases), which requires skills and experience in their diagnosis, as well as joint management of such patients by specialists of various profiles.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».