Effect of starter form, starch concentration, and amount of forage fed on Holstein calf growth from 2 to 4 months of age
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Young, weaned calves are commonly offered ad libitum forage with limited amounts of starter, in contrast to the suggested amount of approximately 5% forage in the diet due to the limited capacity of the rumen, as well as limited ability to digest high fiber feeds. The objective of this research was to compare 2 types of starters (low starch, pelleted vs. high starch, textured), both fed either ad libitum with 5% chopped hay, or fed at restricted rates with ad libitum long grass hay to calves between 2 and 4 mo of age. In trial 1, 48 calves were housed in group pens (68.4 ± 3.37 kg of initial body weight ± standard deviation; 3 pens of 4 calves/pen) and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 diets: (1) low starch pelleted starter (8% starch) blended with 5% chopped hay fed free choice; (2) high starch textured starter (45% starch) blended with 5% chopped hay fed free choice; (3) low starch pelleted starter (8% starch) fed at a rate up to 2.3 kg of dry matter (DM)/d, with free-choice long grass hay; or (4) high starch textured starter (45% starch) fed at a rate up to 2.3 kg of DM/d, with free-choice long grass hay. Trial 1 was analyzed as a completely randomized design using a 2 × 2 arrangement of treatments. Repeated measures were used as appropriate. Pen was the experimental unit. In trial 2, 48 calves (76.4 ± 1.55 kg of initial body weight; 6 pens of 4 calves/pen) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 diets: (1) ad libitum access to a blend of 95% high starch textured starter (42% starch) and 5% chopped grass hay; or (2) high starch textured starter fed up to 2.7 kg of DM/d with free-choice long grass hay. Trial 2 was analyzed as for trial 1, without factorial arrangement. Trials were 56 d long. In trial 1, feed efficiency, average daily gain (ADG), and change in hip width were greater for calves fed high versus low starch diet. Final hip width, ADG, DM intake, and change in hip width were greater for calves fed limited chopped versus free-choice long hay diets. In trial 2, intake, feed efficiency, and all growth measurements were greater in calves fed the ad libitum mixed diet compared with those limit-fed starter up to 2.7 kg as fed with ad libitum hay. Ad libitum hay intake was highly variable among pens and differed up to 2.5-fold by the last week of the trials. In both trials, restricted feeding of starter with ad libitum long grass hay reduced total DM intake by 13 to 17%, ADG by 20%, and hip width change by 10 to 23% compared with a blend of 95% starter and 5% chopped grass hay fed ad libitum.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».