Review of Eklundh, Zevnik, and Guittet's Politics of Anxiety
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Nightly news, social media feeds, and everyday conversations are sources of anxiety that pervade our individual, social, and political worlds.Recently, we hear of increasing tensions between the United States and North Korea, for example, or texts sent in error alerting the public of incoming ballistic missiles.The anxiety produced by such events permeates all of society, from individual psyches to institutional, state, and global entities.While anxiety is not a new phenomenon, anxiety has increasingly become a tool that can be used for political purposes and political ends.Politics of Anxiety, a collection edited by Emmy Eklundh, Andreja Zevnik, and Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet focuses on how anxiety today is different from political uncertainty and how the logic of anxiety may help to unravel and reveal aspects of contemporary politics.The editors divide the contributions into three main parts: Part I, Politicising Anxiety; Part II, Security: Control; and Part III, Resistance: Reclaiming.Part IV, Epilogue, concludes the volume.The editors' introduction to the collection explains that anxiety has replaced risk as the primary "logic of operation" through which individuals, corporations, and governments operate.Unlike the logic of risk and the risk society, which anticipates a particular type of future depending upon the actions taken today, with anticipation based on fear, the editors explain that anxiety is instead the outcome of recognizing that given the gravity of immediate threats and the realization that institutions do not know how to offer security, there may be no future.There are two primary logics of anxiety-the logic of security and the logic of resistance.The logic of security is premised on, as the editors note, "the excessive present."By this they mean that anxiety fuels the notion that present threats need only to be identified and will reveal themselves if appropriate efforts are made today to reveal them.An example is the analysis of big data and the idea that threats can be identified if enough data is gathered and manipulated.The often unreachable quest is to secure the present in order to secure a particular kind of future.At the same time, anxiety is also characterised by a logic of resistance.The logic of resistance works as the public begins to recognize and appreciate that governing bodies do not know how to provide security, nor can they even identify threats in the first place.From this recognition the seeds of resistance may be planted and may provide opportunity to use anxiety to resist government involvement, creating new understandings of the present through protest and "delegitimi[zing] the political elites" (9).Part I, Politicising Anxiety, begins with an examination of the theoretical underpinnings of what anxiety is and how it is significant for political and social life.The chapter by Burgess provides a fascinating examination of the Lacanian psychoanalytic conception of anxiety and how the new age of anxiety "alters
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».