MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3000454276 · doi:10.20381/ruor-24285

Catecholaminergic Axonal Remodeling in Motor Cortex of Mice Following Stroke

2020· dissertation· en· W3000454276 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aida Said

Notice bibliographique

RevueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2020
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNerve injury and regeneration
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCatecholaminergicNeuroscienceMotor cortexCatecholaminergic cell groupsStroke (engine)MedicinePsychologyDopaminePhysicsStimulation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Stroke is a leading cause of death and morbidity worldwide, and leaves stroke survivors with chronic disabilities. One of the key mechanisms that the brain triggers during stroke recovery is the sprouting of new axons and the formation of new neuronal connections. Meanwhile, studies have evidenced this phenomenon with methods using unspecific cell/axon markers. The dopamine (DA) system is thought to be implicated in stroke recovery. However, the specific contribution and remodeling of this system to enhance stroke recovery, and whether D1- class receptors play a role in this process, remain unclear. Using a mouse photothrombosis stroke model, immunohistochemical methods, imaging analysis of axonal fiber density and branching in the motor cortex, we demonstrated a specific dopaminergic axon remodeling in the periinfarct region, with or without DA agonist administration. Axonal remodeling of noradrenergic fibers was subtle. In mice subjected to saline IP injection and physical rehabilitation (running wheels), we observed an increase of only DA fiber density in the periinfarct area as compared to the contralateral (intact) side. However, mice treated with DHX for 7 days followed by physical rehabilitation did not show difference between the two hemispheres. Our results suggest a modulatory effect of DHX on axonal remodeling mainly in the contralateral side. Interestingly, treatment of naïve mice with DHX had no effect of DA axon remodeling suggesting that D1- mediated axonal remodeling is stroke-dependent. We also established the temporal profile of post-stroke DA axon remodeling in the absence of DHX and physical rehabilitation. At 4 days poststroke, there was a significant decrease in DA fiber density and a significant recovery was measured after 28 days relative to the contralateral side. Altogether, our data highlight a major remodeling of DA axons in motor cortex following stroke, and a potential role for D1-class receptors in improving post-stroke recovery. Understanding adaptations of the DA system following stroke will have a great impact on stroke recovery research. Aida Said Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in Neuroscience Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Faculty of Medicine University of Ottawa August 30, 2019 © Aida Said, Ottawa, Canada, 2019 Abstract Stroke is a leading cause of death and morbidity worldwide, and leaves stroke survivors with chronic disabilities. One of the key mechanisms that the brain triggers during stroke recovery is the sprouting of new axons and the formation of new neuronal connections. Meanwhile, studies have evidenced this phenomenon with methods using unspecific cell/axon markers. The dopamine (DA) system is thought to be implicated in stroke recovery. However, the specific contribution and remodeling of this system to enhance stroke recovery, and whether D1-class receptors play a role in this process, remain unclear. Using a mouse photothrombosis stroke model, immunohistochemical methods, imaging analysis of axonal fiber density and branching in the motor cortex, we demonstrated a specific dopaminergic axon remodeling in the periinfarct region, with or without DA agonist administration. Axonal remodeling of noradrenergic fibers was subtle. In mice subjected to saline IP injection and physical rehabilitation (running wheels), we observed an increase of only DA fiber density in the periinfarct area as compared to the contralateral (intact) side. However, mice treated with DHX for 7 days followed by physical rehabilitation did not show difference between the two hemispheres. Our results suggest a modulatory effect of DHX on axonal remodeling mainly in the contralateral side. Interestingly, treatment of naïve mice with DHX had no effect of DA axon remodeling suggesting that D1-mediated axonal remodeling is stroke-dependent. We also established the temporal profile of post-stroke DA axon remodeling in the absence of DHX and physical rehabilitation. At 4 days post-stroke, there was a significant decrease in DA fiber density and a significant recovery was measured after 28 days relative to the contralateral side. Altogether, our data highlight a major remodeling of DA axons in motor cortex following stroke, and a potential role for D1-class receptors in improving post-stroke recovery. Understanding adaptations of the DA system following stroke will have a great impact on stroke recovery research.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,019

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,074
Tête enseignante GPT0,327
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Même sujetNerve injury and regenerationTravaux en français237 207