MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3003904416 · doi:10.1111/jgs.16328

Michael Gordon and Humanism

2020· letter· en· W3003904416 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Paula A. Rochon

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Établissements canadiensPublic Health OntarioWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHumanismMedicineGeriatricsSpecialtyAdmirationCharismaHealth careGerontologyFamily medicineLawPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: Dr. Michael Gordon, the iconic geriatrician, educator, author, and storyteller, has been honored for his contributions to person-centered care by the University of Toronto's Department of Medicine.1 The department announced that their recently established humanism award will now be named the Michael Gordon Award for Humanism in Medicine, a well-deserved and fitting recognition for this extraordinary man.1 Michael Gordon personifies the meaning of humanism in health care. In his warm, charismatic way, he has been an educator and mentor to many. Michael defined what it truly means to practice geriatric medicine in Canada. He holds the distinction of being the first geriatrician accredited by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada in 1981 when geriatric medicine became a specialty in this country. Accordingly, his geriatric medicine specialist certificate is numbered “one.” Early on, he recognized that older adults have complex needs. They require holistic care that focuses on their priorities that may go beyond traditional medical care. When he first started his career in geriatric medicine, his medical colleagues did not understand what geriatric medicine was or its true value to society. Through the unique and personal care he provided to older adults and their families, his educational initiatives, and his leadership in the field, he won the respect and admiration of his medical colleagues. In his role as the physician in chief at Baycrest, he laid the foundations for the development of geriatric medicine at the University of Toronto, in Canada, and around the world. Michael's clinical observations informed much needed geriatric medicine research. He was one of the first to talk about drug-related side effects in older adults and to recognize that they could be prevented. He talked about the importance of the “start low and go slow” approach for prescribing medications to older people as a strategy to prevent adverse drug events. Accordingly, he was the only Canadian selected to be part of the original American Geriatric Society's Beers Criteria® panel. These well-recognized criteria have been updated and are still used internationally to inform drug prescribing for older people. Michael also recognized that medical conditions in older adults often present in very atypical ways. This important observation had a substantial benefit for this group, and he brought it to the attention of the medical community. Dr. Michael Gordon published articles for the scientific literature. Perhaps most important were the series of books that he wrote on aspects of aging that truly matter to older adults and society. The first of these was Old Enough to Feel Better: A Medical Guide for Seniors.2 He also wrote books about caregiving well before it was recognized as an important issue for older adults and their families. His coauthored book Parenting Your Parent describes the experience and challenges of caring for an aging parent.3 Michael Gordon has been a worthy role model for many. Although he is a specialist in geriatric medicine, his example has value to the field of medicine as a whole. He showed us the importance of listening to people's stories and focusing on what matters most to them. His example provides an ideal that others in medicine can learn from and aspire to emulate. The humanism award reflects the commitment of the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto to the delivery of person-centered care. As such, it is fitting that this award is now being named for Dr. Michael Gordon. His example is one that we should all try to follow. I can think of no better person for whom to name the humanism award. Paula A. Rochon holds the RTO/ERO Chair in Geriatric Medicine at the University of Toronto. The author has declared no conflict of interest. Paula A. Rochon conceived the idea, wrote the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript. There is no sponsor for this manuscript.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,038

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,028
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,008
Communication savante0,0080,008
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0140,023
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,066
Tête enseignante GPT0,363
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyMême sujetHealth and Medical Research ImpactsTravaux en français237 207